More Experts Question Bush Guard Documents

[valvano]

http://weeklystandard.com/Utilities/printer_preview.asp?idArticle=4596&R=9FCD2F192

Even a Kerry supporter feels they are a hoax...

:eek:

[DroppinScience]

Why are all these sources from uber-right-wingers? Where's the "objective" sources?

Gimme a Reuters or AP, dammit!

[infidel]

Keep up the claims of forged documents as long as you please. All it does is keep the media's attention on it longer. If no one said anything it would be all forgotten by next week.
This is probably the reason why bush himself isn't disputing the claims. The Reps know full well if you repeat even a blatant lie enough times it starts sounding like the truth. They base their whole campaign on this concept.

[bilbo]

Stephen F. Hayes? (http://video.lisarein.com/dailyshow/june2004/stephenhayes/)

I like this journalistic gem in particluar: "They look mighty suspicious," says a veteran forensic document expert who asked not to be quoted by name.

Next (n) :rolleyes:

[EN[i]GMA]

Actually the Weekly Standard is right wing rag that isn't worth the paper it's printed on.

[Abe Froman]

If its even printed on paper. Doesn't look like it to me. I think it could be a fake paper.