PDA

View Full Version : WHERE are the WMDs??


sneakyimp
09-17-2004, 06:30 PM
you can vote on CNN...guess which answer is winning?

http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/paula.zahn.now/index.html

yeahwho
09-17-2004, 06:36 PM
That was Fun! :D I even smiled.

QueenAdrock
09-17-2004, 07:56 PM
I voted for the right answer! Hurray for me!

ASsman
09-17-2004, 08:41 PM
The Batcave is not an option.... I choose not to vote for that reason.

valvano
09-17-2004, 08:46 PM
one of the answers should be "I don't know, go ask Bill Clinton, George Bush Jr, John Kerry, the UN, the British, etc since they all said that Iraq had them" (y)

ASsman
09-17-2004, 09:02 PM
Some of those people have now said they were wrong....Also Im still not clear what side of the playing field you're in.

Ace42
09-18-2004, 01:41 AM
one of the answers should be "I don't know, go ask Bill Clinton, George Bush Jr, John Kerry, the UN, the British, etc since they all said that Iraq had them" (y)

Actually, if you check the Butler report, you'll see the intelligence that was provided was highly dubious. Bush et al had access to the whole story (unlike the UK house of commons who were issued with what they nearlly all consider to have been a misleading dossier) and thus cannot say "oh, someone said they had them" as unlike a number of the above, they could actually see the intelligence "in situ" so to speak and thus see the clear and obvious fact that it was shonkier than a 3 legged donkey.

Canabian
09-18-2004, 02:06 AM
one of the answers should be "I don't know, go ask Bill Clinton, George Bush Jr, John Kerry, the UN, the British, etc since they all said that Iraq had them" (y)

When did the UN, John Kerry or Bill Clinton make these statements and where? Please provide references or consider yourself labeled as a right wing, forum-polluting troll (n)

Funny how there are 111 RED NECK, NRA card carrying, Republican psychopaths that actually voted "They are hidden in Iraq. "

Prime example of why chemical castration should be applied liberally to certain segments of the population :rolleyes:

Funkaloyd
09-18-2004, 07:46 AM
CNN has a liberal ajenda, they won't even report the truth about Iraq and AL Qaeda.
CNN will not call a TERRORIST by the proper name. They refer to them as person, or millitent.

Haha, am I to assume that you believe Fox News has a liberal agenda too?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,124954,00.html

valvano
09-18-2004, 08:58 AM
When did the UN, John Kerry or Bill Clinton make these statements and where? Please provide references or consider yourself labeled as a right wing, forum-polluting troll (n)

Funny how there are 111 RED NECK, NRA card carrying, Republican psychopaths that actually voted "They are hidden in Iraq. "

Prime example of why chemical castration should be applied liberally to certain segments of the population :rolleyes:

So when was the last time Canada liberated a country, defeated a dictator, crushed communism, or did anything worthwhile towards world peace?

Oh, BTW, thats some nice stereotyping there with your red neck comment, you Labatts drinking, hockey playing, pot smoking, UN ass kissing, Fidel Castro loving, spineless yellow belly tree hugging hemp wearing canadian liberal...........

infidel
09-18-2004, 09:20 AM
So when was the last time Canada liberated a country, defeated a dictator, crushed communism, or did anything worthwhile towards world peace?

Oh, BTW, thats some nice stereotyping there with your red neck comment, you Labatts drinking, hockey playing, pot smoking, UN ass kissing, Fidel Castro loving, spineless yellow belly tree hugging hemp wearing canadian liberal...........
That sounds like a complement to me.

ASsman
09-18-2004, 09:22 AM
No entry found for ajenda.

Did you mean agenda?

And as for "crushing communism", uh where? Wait whats that North Korea?You ARE communist? Hot shit.. Also you can't say that killing a couple of thousand people in Central America, and torturing them until they confess to beeing comies, doesn't constitute "crushing communism"...

And as for factual backup of this.... You're the one who stated it... So you backup your statement.

EN[i]GMA
09-18-2004, 09:49 AM
Yeah, imagine that, a country that hasn't been in a war in 60 years has the gall to call itself peaceful. Nice try valv.

sneakyimp
09-18-2004, 02:59 PM
CNN has a liberal ajenda, they won't even report the truth about Iraq and AL Qaeda. CNN will not call a TERRORIST by the proper name. They refer to them as person, or millitent.


bullshit, sisko. I found this link on rightnation.us -- where you should be!

Valvano, you are mistaken too. Canada actually kicked OUR ass in the war of 1812 because we tried to invade them. Furthermore, they fought in WWI and WWII. Those were pretty noble wars, werent they? They had soldiers at Normandy. Wars are fucking awful and you should know that. Now shut your pie hole.

sneakyimp
09-18-2004, 03:08 PM
Furthermore, Sisko, referring to a person as a 'militant' (NOT 'millitent' as you so artfully wrote) rather than a terrorist is a lot like calling a 'prisoner of war' and 'enemy combatant' only it doesn't deprive people of the their rights to due process of law.

Both approaches deny that there is actually a WAR going on. Terrorism is a highly unconventional form of warfare. Calling someone a 'jordanian' militant at least suggests that an attempt is being made to understand the evil bastard and get to the root of problem. calling them a 'terrorist' makes you sound shrill and uneducated. It may be accurate, but if that's the only term you know how to use, then you probably have NO FUCKING CLUE about why they're doing what they are.

And Val, you might also recall that Canada fought alongside us in Korea, Gulf War I, and Afghanistan. now shut your pie hole again.