D_Raay
10-20-2004, 04:48 PM
Bush asked that the 9-11 Investigations focus on intelligence failures, and as a result, we got an investigation that reported on intelligence failures and ONLY on intelligence failures. But let us take an analogy to show how worthless such a report is. After the sinking of RMS Titanic, if the investigation had been ordered to only examine the quality of metal used in the hull, the official conclusion for the loss of Titanic would have concluded that the metal was in hindsight not sufficient to the task of running up against icebergs. Left unsaid because it was outside the defined scope of the Titanic Report was Bruce Ismay's "suggestion" that Titanic try to set a new speed record and Captain E.J. Smith's recklessness in agreeing to do so.
Likewise, critical questions about 9-11 were intentionally excluded from the scope of the 9-11 report, and by design do not appear in the final report. Questions like, who was really on those planes, given that the FBI has admitted that the documents used to name the Arab suspects were all forgeries. And, what is that evidence that links arrested Mossad agents with 9-11 that was classified by the US Government?
Just what was Bush planning to conceal when he asked Congress to limit the investigation?
Likewise, critical questions about 9-11 were intentionally excluded from the scope of the 9-11 report, and by design do not appear in the final report. Questions like, who was really on those planes, given that the FBI has admitted that the documents used to name the Arab suspects were all forgeries. And, what is that evidence that links arrested Mossad agents with 9-11 that was classified by the US Government?
Just what was Bush planning to conceal when he asked Congress to limit the investigation?