PDA

View Full Version : Check it out! The left only occupies a small portion of the US


ClifRa JOnes
11-03-2004, 04:08 PM
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/vote2004/countymap.htm

ASsman
11-03-2004, 05:25 PM
That's because rednecks live on farms. And fuck their sisters. Retard. If you that wasn't obvious to you, you trully are a moron.

valvano
11-03-2004, 05:48 PM
and ghetto living inner city crackhead felons love the democrats....

:p

bobbydigital
11-03-2004, 05:49 PM
and ghetto living inner city crackhead felons love the democrats....

:p


What?? As if they gave a shit or voted, for that matter.

marsdaddy
11-03-2004, 05:56 PM
Hmm, so the 49% of the people who voted for Kerry don't occupy where they voted?

infidel
11-03-2004, 06:31 PM
The bush whores seem to think GW got 100% of the votes. Almost an even divide among the people who voted plus who knows how many who didn't vote still don't support bush. Probably brings the number 60% of the country is anti-bush

Perhaps it's time for the blue states to succeed from the union, no problem since the blues contribute to 80% of the economy. Calif alone produces more income to the US than 32 red states combined. Red states are the ones that suck up all the welfare and have higher unemployment.

hpdrifter
11-03-2004, 07:03 PM
secede from the union.

Did you notice that the blue states are also the most populous states? There may be more square mileage that is red, but the population density in those areas is really low. It doesn't mean that more people like Bush, it just means that rural areas like Bush and urban centers like Kerry.

sea_dragon
11-03-2004, 07:11 PM
If you superimpose that map on a regular map, you'd see that it's basically cities that supported Kerry, and rural (and some suburban) areas that supported bush. Urban areas have much denser population (duh!) so obviously they take up less physical space.

Plus all those gray spots are divided areas, they could be mostly blue as easily as red.

QueenAdrock
11-03-2004, 07:17 PM
Small portion, but have you ever been to Kansas? It's not exactly populated there. There's a farm every half an hour or so. Where I live, driving one mile in 5 minutes is seen as "not bad".

Even if we occupy a small portion, we occupy the best portion. NYC, LA, DC, we all rule. Nebraska ain't got nothin' on us.

All-Trac
11-03-2004, 07:23 PM
Great post. Actually the state with one of the worst WELFARE problems is California. The illegal alien problem is even worse there then in TX. Surprise thats a big Kerry state.

I find it funny that you people see to ignore the fact that Clinton did not win the popular vote in 2000, and this win for Bush is the LARGEST MARGIN OF VICTORY FOR A PRESIDENT IN MODERN HISTORY.

ASsman
11-03-2004, 07:26 PM
JESUS CHRIST!

infidel
11-03-2004, 07:28 PM
LARGEST MARGIN OF VICTORY FOR A PRESIDENT IN MODERN HISTORY. Pure republican spin and you're eating it right up. That's only because more people voted than any other time in history.

What do you want to bet that the sig heil comes back in style among bush whores?

marsdaddy
11-03-2004, 07:33 PM
Great post. Actually the state with one of the worst WELFARE problems is California. The illegal alien problem is even worse there then in TX. Surprise thats a big Kerry state.

I find it funny that you people see to ignore the fact that Clinton did not win the popular vote in 2000, and this win for Bush is the LARGEST MARGIN OF VICTORY FOR A PRESIDENT IN MODERN HISTORY.Okay, so California is the world's 6th largest economy -- it was 5th before Bush took office -- and you're claiming it's a drain on the country? And the illegal alien problem will naturally be worse. There is actually a reason to come to Cali.

Clinton didn't win the popular vote, because he was not allowed to run. If you mean Gore, you might want to check your facts. He did win the pop vote.

endofmystump
11-03-2004, 08:42 PM
Why the anger Infidel? "Bushwhores"? People have different world views and come from different places. To have credibility you must understand that. The frequent Nazi references don't show much of an open mind either...

ASsman
11-03-2004, 08:49 PM
So if I make reference to Hitler I am not open minded? What kind of asshat sense does that make?

endofmystump
11-03-2004, 08:50 PM
Not to you Man of Ass. That is to Infidel's post a couple up.

ASsman
11-03-2004, 08:53 PM
What do you want to bet that the sig heil comes back in style among bush whores?
This one?

infidel
11-04-2004, 12:14 AM
Why the anger Infidel? "Bushwhores"? People have different world views and come from different places. To have credibility you must understand that. The frequent Nazi references don't show much of an open mind either...
I have little tolerance for people who voted bush based on fear and hatred rather than issues that are obvious. Hilter and Limbaugh prove it all too well that it works to gain support.
The republicans have no excuse now with majority in the houses, lets see how deep of a hole they can dig.

Mark my words, in order to avoid the avoid the worst recession the US has ever seen taxes will be raised considerably.

Abe Froman
11-04-2004, 12:21 AM
Don't blame illegals for taking jobs. They are stealing the money from the people that hire them. Take away the jobs and they won't come over. But that would be bad for business! OH NOOOOO! Not bad for business! Can't have that! Can't arrest and punish those who hire undocumented workers. Not that the min wage illegals earn would require them to pay taxes being below the poverty level set by the very government that can't build a wall on the border because they don't control the house and senate and white house, oh wait, they do!!! Ummm, illegals are bad!! Blame them! They don't have money or a lobby! Or speak English! Easy pick'ns! No pun intended!

I see the workers busting their ass in the fields in Oxnard and around L.A. Those who think illegal aliens suck welfare and are evil, come on out and lets see you pick strawberries for 10 hours a day all week. Yea, thats what I thought. Enjoy your pie at Shoneys.

DroppinScience
11-04-2004, 12:25 AM
LARGEST MARGIN OF VICTORY FOR A PRESIDENT IN MODERN HISTORY.

That's idiotic.

Clinton in both terms won by a wider margin. The first Bush won by a wider margin. Reagan in both terms certainly won by a wider margin. Carter won by a wider margin. Ford... well, he never won shit (;)). Nixon obliterated McGovern in 1972 (but he'd have to resign in disgrace just two years later... I predict something similar to go down for Bush). Johnson whooped Goldwater's ass. Eisenhower... Truman... FDR whooped Hoover by a landslide in 1932 (and the other 3 times he was re-elected).

What modern history are you reading, son?

Schmeltz
11-04-2004, 01:38 AM
Wow, 48% of voters fit into that tiny little space?

hellojello
11-04-2004, 02:37 AM
i don't usually speak in such harsh language but
ClifRa JOnes, i hate you

Documad
11-04-2004, 02:44 AM
. . . proud to be living in one of the blue bits!

infidel
11-04-2004, 04:28 AM
i don't usually speak in such harsh language but
ClifRa JOnes, i hate you
We really shouldn't be hating bush supporters
being repulsed by them is good enough.