PDA

View Full Version : Tears for Kerry


abdulmohammad
11-04-2004, 06:22 PM
Guess who's back in the motherfuckin (white) house with a fat dick (http://www.ebaumsworld.com/flashloops-fatdick.html) for your motherfuckin mouth!! Stompin out yall bitchass liberals, aww skeet skeet skeet skeet (http://www.ebaumsworld.com/flashloops-skeet.html)

I guess John Kerry went into the primary without a plan to win the election.

The Democrats threw everything they had at this election. They ran a phony Vietnam War hero and a phony Southerner. They had middle-aged women executives at MTV hawking "Rock the Vote" to entice the most uninformed young people to vote for Kerry. They had Bruce Springsteen, Dave Matthews and New York Times darling Eminem. They had documentaries, books, the universities, Hollywood (and the French!) on their side.

They had liberal thugs ransacking Bush-Cheney headquarters, stealing Bush-Cheney signs and slashing the tires of Bush-Cheney get-out-the-vote vans on Election Day. In Colorado, they traded voter registrations for crack cocaine. In Ohio, they registered Mary Poppins and Dick Tracy. In South Carolina, Emily's List called Republican households and gave them incorrect information about the location of polling places.

The media campaigned heavily for Kerry with endless Abu Ghraib coverage, phony National Guard documents and, days before the election, false news reports that hundreds of tons of munitions had been looted in Iraq.

The Democrats' cheating never stopped. The big story of this election is the fraudulent exit polls on Election Day. Strange as it seems to me, it is well acknowledged that people are more likely to come out and vote for a winner. Early exit polls showing Kerry the clear winner could be expected to depress the vote for Bush.

Stunningly inaccurate exit polls released around noon on Election Day convinced news anchors, talking heads and even the campaigns that Kerry would win walking away. But at 9 p.m., when the first actual results began to come in, the election flipped to Bush. It was the first Kerry flip-flop that actually served the national interest.

The exit polls were absurd: They showed Kerry winning Pennsylvania by 20 points and Bush tied with Kerry in Mississippi. Only monkey business can explain the wildly pro-Kerry exit polls – admittedly hard to believe with a party that has behaved so honorably throughout this campaign. Michael Barone speculates that the sites of exit polling were leaked to the Democrats, and Democrats sent large numbers of voters to those polls to take exit polls and throw the results.

But for all their chicanery, vote-stealing, Hollywood starlets, fake polls and faux patriotism, the Democrats were wiped out on Election Day.

Bush won the largest popular vote in history with a 3.5 million margin. Indeed, simply by getting a majority of the country to vote for him – the left's most hated politician since Richard Nixon – Bush did something "rock star" Bill Clinton never did. Bush maintained or increased his vote in every state but Vermont. Republicans picked up seats in the House and Senate, and continue to dominate state governorships. Also making history of a sort, Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle lost his election, marking the first time in half a century a Senate leader has been defeated.

To Michael Moore, George Soros, Terry McAuliffe, Dan Rather, Al Franken and the whole gang at Air America Radio – you were great, guys! Thanks for the help! We couldn't have done it without you!

ASsman
11-04-2004, 06:24 PM
Hahah, again with the homosexual reference.

EF shhhh Hutton
11-04-2004, 06:24 PM
Nice read. Thanks


It makes me tingle knowing Bush won. Dem Libs is pissed-oh momma.

Ace42
11-04-2004, 06:27 PM
Nice read. Thanks.

Thanks for the read, or for his jizz trickling down your throat?

EF shhhh Hutton
11-04-2004, 06:28 PM
Thanks for the read, or for his jizz trickling down your throat?



More insults? Fine...still doesn't change the fact that Bush won. (LOVE IT)

ASsman
11-04-2004, 06:29 PM
Guess who's back in the motherfuckin (white) house with a fat dick for your motherfuckin mouth!! Stompin out yall bitchass liberals, aww skeet skeet skeet skeet
Speaking of insults.

Ace42
11-04-2004, 06:29 PM
More insults?

For it to be an insult, it has to be not true. Questions can't be "untrue".

QED.

[That's a latin abbreviation for "You're too fucking stupid to see your rights being eroded and your life getting shitter"]

EF shhhh Hutton
11-04-2004, 06:31 PM
For it to be an insult, it has to be not true. Questions can't be "untrue".

QED.

[That's a latin abbreviation for "You're too fucking stupid to see your rights being eroded and your life getting shitter"]


::holding up 4 fingers:::


4 more years, bud!

ASsman
11-04-2004, 06:35 PM
Hahah, next tactic to be used by Hutton.
Putting his fingers in his ears, and screaming "LA LA LA LA!".

Ace42
11-04-2004, 06:36 PM
4 more years, bud!

Yeah, but you'll only be able to afford the internet fees required to spam this place for two of those.

Hey, but think of it this way, all your friends that haven't been killed in wars or terrorist actions will be bumming change off the snot-rich too.

Whois
11-04-2004, 06:36 PM
Isn't that a song by Smokey Robinson and the Miracles ?

EF shhhh Hutton
11-04-2004, 06:41 PM
Oh, so if kerry would have won (THANK GOD he didn't!) Terrorists would have eased back and started liking Americans?

Look at it this way, at least your boy Saddamm is still alive (I know how much you libs dig him)

ASsman
11-04-2004, 07:31 PM
I'm tired of arguing the "what if" bullshit. We are only arguing it because you inbreds can't let it go. We will see, we aren't debating about pink fucking ponys. You will see, oh wait, you didn't see it the first time why would you see it this time. Damn, just thought of that .

endofmystump
11-04-2004, 07:52 PM
Kerry has six houses and a billionaire wife. I think he's going to be okay. He is the smart one. Pass the catsup (old school spelling strictly).

Whois
11-04-2004, 07:53 PM
Kerry has six houses and a billionaire wife. I think he's going to be okay. He is the smart one. Pass the catsup (old school spelling strictly).

Have you seen this?

http://www.lewrockwell.com/rogers/rogers93.html

It's pretty damm funny...

endofmystump
11-04-2004, 08:10 PM
I liked that one. Teresa Hienz (sp?) Kerry only paid 12% taxes on the millions of interest she made last year from her trusts. She had very smart lawyers set them up. And Kerry married into it. Edwards made millions winning b.s. lawsuits against OBGYNs claiming they caused cerebral palsy (sp?) by not doing c-sections. And these guys were out for the poor man.
Don't get me wrong. Mr. Warbucks from Texas ain't doin' so bad either. But at least he didn't try to say he was for the poor....

Baraka
11-04-2004, 08:32 PM
Well, it looks like our good ol' board troll (http://www.doingsomething.com/sureshots/Fern.jpg) is back to spew his garbage.


They ran a phony Vietnam War hero and a phony Southerner.

"Phony Vietnam War hero"? Riiiiiiiiiight. Read me (http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Swift_Boat_Veterans_for_Truth) please. Kthanx. The Swift Boat Vets for Truth have been completely discredited (http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx@docID=231.html). First of all, in September 2004, Vice Admiral Ronald A. Route, the Navy inspector general, completed a review of Kerry's combat medals and concluded he deserved to received his medals. Kerry served honourably in Vietnam.

And just how the hell is John Edwards a "phony Southerner"? That doesn't make any sense whatsoever. What? He doesn't share your xenophobic politics, so that makes him a "phony Southerner"? Pathetic.

And getting back to the Swift Boat Vets, this isn't the first time we've seen this crap from Karl Rove and George W. Bush. They did it to one of their own.

John McCain defended Kerry against this garbage: "I think the ad is dishonest and dishonorable. As it is none of these individuals served on the boat (Kerry) commanded. Many of his crewmates have testified to his courage under fire. I think John Kerry served honorably in Vietnam."

McCain went through the same crap:

Bush Waged Nasty Smear Campaign Against McCain in 2000

Bush Supporters Called McCain “The Fag Candidate”
In South Carolina, Bush supporters circulated church fliers that labeled McCain “the fag candidate.” Columnist Frank Rich noted that the fliers were distributed “even as Bush subtly reinforced that message by indicating he wouldn’t hire openly gay people for his administration.”

McCain Slurs Included Illegitimate Children, Homosexuality And A Drug-Addict Wife
Among the rumors circulated against McCain in 2000 in South Carolina was that his adopted Bangladeshi daughter was actually black, that McCain was both gay and cheated on his wife, and that his wife Cindy was a drug addict.”

Bush Campaign Used Code Words to Question McCain’s Temper
“A smear campaign of the ugliest sort is now coursing through the contest for the presidency in 2000. Using the code word "temper," a group of Senate Republicans, and at least some outriders of the George W. Bush campaign, are spreading the word that John McCain is unstable. The subtext, also suggested in this whispering campaign, is that he returned from 5 1/2 years as a POW in North Vietnam with a loose screw. And it is bruited about that he shouldn't be entrusted with nuclear weapons.”

Bush Supporters Questioned McCain’s Sanity
“Some of George W. Bush's supporters have questioned Republican presidential candidate John McCain's fitness for the White House, suggesting that his five years as a prisoner of war in North Vietnam drove him insane at the time.”

Bush Supporters Spread Racist Rumors About McCain’s Daughter
Bush supporters in South Carolina made race-baiting phone calls saying that McCain had a “black child.” The McCains’ daughter, Bridget, was adopted from Mother Teresa’s orphanage in Bangladesh. In August 2000, columnist Maureen Dowd wrote that the McCains “are still seething about Bush supporters in South Carolina spreading word of their dark-skinned adopted daughter.”

Rove Suggests Former POW McCain Committed Treason and Fathered Child With Black Prostitute
In 2000, McCain operatives in SC accused Rove of spreading rumors against McCain, such as “suggestions that McCain had committed treason while a prisoner of war, and had fathered a child by a black prostitute,” according to the New Yorker.

After Rove Denied Role In McCain Whisper Campaign, Reporters Concluded He Was Behind It
A December 1999 Dallas Morning News linked Rove to a series of campaign dirty tricks, including his College Republican efforts, allegedly starting a whisper campaign about Ann Richard being too gay-friendly, spreading stories about Jim Hightower’s involvement in a kickback scheme and leaking the educational history of Lena Guerrero. The article also outlined current dirty tricks and whisper campaigns against McCain in South Carolina, including that “McCain may be unstable as a result of being tortured while a prisoner of war in North Vietnam.” (DMN, 12/2/99) After the article was published, Rove blasted Slater in the Manchester, NH airport, “nose to nose” according to one witness, with Rove claiming Slater had “harmed his reputation,” Slater later noted. But according to one witness, “What was interesting then is that everyone on the campaign charter concluded that Rove was responsible for rumors about McCain.”

Rove Was In Close Touch With McConnell, McCain-Feingold’s Chief Opponent
Senior White House adviser Karl Rove was in close contact with Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) during McConnell’s effort to fight the McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Bill in the U.S. Senate. According to Newsweek, though Rove and Bush have publicly kept their distance from McConnell on the issue, “sources tell Newsweek that Rove is, in fact, in close touch with McConnell as GOP experts study the bill for hidden land mines.”

Bush Campaign Accused of Using Push Polls Against McCain
College of Charleston student Suzette Latsko said she received a telephone call from a woman who identified herself as an employee of Voter/Consumer Research, and that the caller misrepresented McCain’s positions and asked if Latsko knew McCain had been reprimanded for interfering with federal regulators in the savings and loan scandal. Voter/Consumer Research is listed as a polling contractor on Bush’s Federal Election Commission filings; the Bush campaign has paid Voter/Consumer Research $93,000 through December 31, 1999. Bush spokesman Ari Fleischer denied the call was a push poll, but said it was important that the Republican Party remember McCain’s role in the S&L crisis.

Bush Campaign Acknowledged Making Phone Calls
Tucker Eskew, Bush’s South Carolina spokesman, acknowledged the Bush campaign made such calls, but claimed they were not “push polls.” Eskew added, “Show me a baseless comment in those questions.”

Bush Used Fringe Veterans Group to Attack McCain as “Manchurian Candidate”
“In the case of Ted Sampley, the same guy who did Bush's dirty work in going after Sen. John McCain in the 2000 Republican primaries is doing the job against Kerry this year. Sampley dared compare McCain, who spent five years as a Vietnam POW, with ‘the Manchurian Candidate.’”

Sampley Called McCain a “Coward” and a Traitor
“Sampley… accused McCain of being a weak-minded coward who had escaped death by collaborating with the enemy. Sampley claimed that McCain had first been compromised by the Vietnamese, then recruited by the Soviets.”


They had middle-aged women executives at MTV hawking "Rock the Vote" to entice the most uninformed young people to vote for Kerry. They had Bruce Springsteen, Dave Matthews and New York Times darling Eminem. They had documentaries, books, the universities, Hollywood (and the French!) on their side.

Whoa. Well, for one who complains and whines about "liberals" and "crying", you're certainly doing your fair share here, aren't you?


They had liberal thugs ransacking Bush-Cheney headquarters, stealing Bush-Cheney signs and slashing the tires of Bush-Cheney get-out-the-vote vans on Election Day. In Colorado, they traded voter registrations for crack cocaine. In Ohio, they registered Mary Poppins and Dick Tracy. In South Carolina, Emily's List called Republican households and gave them incorrect information about the location of polling places.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiight. Such wild claims there little boy. Care to back up any of these claims of yours?


The media campaigned heavily for Kerry with endless Abu Ghraib coverage, phony National Guard documents and, days before the election, false news reports that hundreds of tons of munitions had been looted in Iraq.

The media campaigned for Kerry? Right, okay, sure. False (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A1733-2004Oct27.html) news (http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/10/29/iraq.explosives.ap/) reports (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6376212/)? I think you're out of touch with reality.


The Democrats' cheating never stopped. The big story of this election is the fraudulent exit polls on Election Day. Strange as it seems to me, it is well acknowledged that people are more likely to come out and vote for a winner. Early exit polls showing Kerry the clear winner could be expected to depress the vote for Bush.

Stunningly inaccurate exit polls released around noon on Election Day convinced news anchors, talking heads and even the campaigns that Kerry would win walking away. But at 9 p.m., when the first actual results began to come in, the election flipped to Bush. It was the first Kerry flip-flop that actually served the national interest.

So, according to you, it was John Kerry's fault that inaccurate polling was conducted? So then, is John Kerry directly responsible for world hunger and international organized crime?


The exit polls were absurd: They showed Kerry winning Pennsylvania by 20 points and Bush tied with Kerry in Mississippi. Only monkey business can explain the wildly pro-Kerry exit polls – admittedly hard to believe with a party that has behaved so honorably throughout this campaign. Michael Barone speculates that the sites of exit polling were leaked to the Democrats, and Democrats sent large numbers of voters to those polls to take exit polls and throw the results.

SPECULATES. You just said it yourself. SPECULATION. Good job there.


But for all their chicanery, vote-stealing, Hollywood starlets, fake polls and faux patriotism, the Democrats were wiped out on Election Day.

"vote-stealing"? Hello: all sides maintain that this election went smoothly and there were very few problems reported. "faux patriotism"? What? So, only neo-conservative Republicans, who received medical deferments and exemptions from the Vietnam War (while supporting it, mind you), who then go on to lie to the country about the reasons for illegally invading the sovereign nation of Iraq (and the idiots who vote for neo-conservative chicken hawks) are true patriots? Riiiiiiiiiiiiight. So, was John McCain then a "faux patriot" in the 2000 Republican Primaries, but today he's now a true patriot?

I've said it before and I'll say it again: I hope you get drafted. And when you do, do us a favour and don't come crying to us.

Baraka
11-04-2004, 08:34 PM
I liked that one. Teresa Hienz (sp?) Kerry only paid 12% taxes on the millions of interest she made last year from her trusts. She had very smart lawyers set them up. And Kerry married into it. Edwards made millions winning b.s. lawsuits against OBGYNs claiming they caused cerebral palsy (sp?) by not doing c-sections. And these guys were out for the poor man.
Don't get me wrong. Mr. Warbucks from Texas ain't doin' so bad either. But at least he didn't try to say he was for the poor....

I agree to a certain extent. Edwards is actually opposed to NAFTA and is a populist politician. Kerry is another center-right/Clintonesque/compassionate conservative. But a Kerry administraiton would be much more sane than the maniacs who will be governing America for the next four years.

QueenAdrock
11-04-2004, 08:36 PM
When Bush fucks over the country even more, we'll be there to rub your bigoted fat faces in it. You may have a win to gloat over for about a month, but we'll have gloating rights of "I told you so" for the next FOUR YEARS. So suck on that.

ASsman
11-04-2004, 08:37 PM
Nice Baraka.

endofmystump
11-04-2004, 08:38 PM
I don't like the neo-cons or the far right either and both are definitely part of the Bush camp. Those are the ones who most support the war. However, I think we'll either suffer terrorist attacks or have to shed blood in the Middle East as long as we support Israel. What is the solution?

Baraka
11-04-2004, 08:41 PM
The Separate Realities of Bush and Kerry Supporters - PIPA, the Program on International Policy Attitudes at the University of Maryland

The PIPA Report (http://www.pipa.org/OnlineReports/Pres_Election_04/html/new_10_21_04.html#1)

The blind leading the blind

Even if they don't like to say it out loud, lots of Democrats think that George Bush's supporters are a horde of ignoramuses. Now comes evidence that they're right! A remarkable new report titled "The Separate Realities of Bush and Kerry Supporters" from PIPA, the Program on International Policy Attitudes at the University of Maryland, suggests that rank and file Republicans are more benighted than even the most supercilious coastal elitist would imagine.

Analyzing data from a series of nationwide polls, the report finds that a majority of Bush supporters believe things about the world that are objectively untrue, while the majority of Kerry supporters dwell in the reality-based community. For example, Bush backers largely think that the president and his policies are popular internationally. Seventy-five percent believe that Iraq was providing "substantial" aid to al-Qaida, and 63 percent say clear evidence of this has been found. That, of course, would be news even to Donald Rumsfeld, who earlier this month told the Council On Foreign Relations, "To my knowledge, I have not seen any strong, hard evidence that links the two."

Though its language is dispassionate, the report lays responsibility for this epidemic of ignorance at the White House's door. "So why are Bush supporters clinging so tightly to these beliefs in the face of repeated disconfirmations?" it asks. "Apparently one key reason is that they continue to hear the Bush administration confirming these beliefs."

Indeed, it says, "an overwhelming 82% [of Bush supporters] perceive the Bush administration as saying that Iraq had WMD (63%) or a major WMD program (19%). Only 16% of Bush supporters perceive the administration as saying that Iraq had some limited activities, but not an active program (15%) or had nothing (1%). The pattern on al Qaeda is similar. Seventy-five percent of Bush supporters think the Bush administration is currently saying Iraq was providing substantial support to al Qaeda (56%) or even that it was directly involved in 9/11 (19%). Further, 55% of Bush supporters say it is their impression the Bush administration is currently saying the US has found clear evidence Saddam Hussein was working closely with al Qaeda (not saying clear evidence found: 37%)."

These people aren't going to be swayed by the argument that Bush has alienated American's allies and left the country isolated in the world, because they don't believe this to be the case. "Despite a steady flow of official statements, public demonstrations, and public opinion polls showing that the US war against Iraq is quite unpopular, only 31% of Bush supporters recognize that the majority of people in the world oppose the US having gone to war with Iraq," the study says. Bush supporters also think that world public opinion favors Bush's reelection. In a poll taken from September 3-7, the study says, "57% of Bush supporters assumed that the majority of people in the world would prefer to see Bush reelected, 33% assumed that views are evenly divided and only 9% assumed that Kerry would be preferred."

In fact, a PIPA study released in early September found that a majority or plurality of people from 32 countries preferred Kerry to Bush. PIPA surveyed 34,330 people, ages 15 and above, from regions all over the world. A Pew poll released this spring similarly found that "large majorities in every country, except for the U.S., hold an unfavorable opinion of Bush."

Bush supporters are also mistaken about the president's own positions (a pattern of misapprehension that an earlier PIPA report also documented). "Majorities incorrectly assumed that Bush supports multilateral approaches to various international issues -- the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (69%), the treaty banning land mines (72%); 51% incorrectly assumed he favors US participation in the Kyoto treaty -- the principal international accord on global warming... Only 13% of supporters are aware that he opposes labor and environmental standards in trade agreements -- 74% incorrectly believe that he favors including labor and environmental standards in agreements on trade. In all these cases, there is a recurring theme: majorities of Bush supporters favor these positions, and they infer that Bush favors them as well."

According to the report, this reality gap is something new in American life. "So why do Bush supporters show such a resistance to accepting dissonant information?" it asks. "While it is normal for people to show some resistance, the magnitude of the denial goes beyond the ordinary. Bush supporters have succeeded in suppressing awareness of the findings of a whole series of high-profile reports about prewar Iraq that have been blazoned across the headlines of newspapers and prompted extensive, high-profile and agonizing reflection. The fact that a large portion of Americans say they are unaware that the original reasons that the US took military action -- and for which Americans continue to die on a daily basis -- are not turning out to be valid, are probably not due to a simple failure to pay attention to the news."

The analysis says that the roots of this denial could lie in the trauma of 9/11 and people's desire to hold on to their image of Bush as a "capable protector." It offers no guidance, though, on how ordinary Republicans might be coaxed back to reality.

And while "The Separate Realities of Bush and Kerry Supporters" may be perversely satisfying to Democrats in its confirmation of blue-state prejudices, it carries a pretty disturbing question for all rational Americans: How can arguments based on fact prevail in a nation where so many people know so little?

Baraka
11-04-2004, 08:47 PM
Oh, so if kerry would have won (THANK GOD he didn't!) Terrorists would have eased back and started liking Americans?

Look at it this way, at least your boy Saddamm is still alive (I know how much you libs dig him)

So, if "libs dig" Saddam Hussien, then conservatives "dig" Adolf Hitler.

Rodie
11-04-2004, 09:03 PM
The Democrats' cheating never stopped. The big story of this election is the fraudulent exit polls on Election Day. Strange as it seems to me, it is well acknowledged that people are more likely to come out and vote for a winner. Early exit polls showing Kerry the clear winner could be expected to depress the vote for Bush.

Stunningly inaccurate exit polls released around noon on Election Day convinced news anchors, talking heads and even the campaigns that Kerry would win walking away. But at 9 p.m., when the first actual results began to come in, the election flipped to Bush. It was the first Kerry flip-flop that actually served the national interest.

This is a huge fucking load right here. Why would the Democrats fuck with the exit polls. Oh too depress the vote for Bush. Yea that makes a whole lot of fucking sense. If you ask me, the Republicans are up to their old tricks (If I remember correctly they are they only party to have stolen an election). You see I followed polls closely, all of them (http://www.realclearpolitics.com) and Bush rarely, rarely, was able to break 50%. And you're telling me that on election day he broke 51%. Yea, I don't buy it. Why wasn't there a paper trail in Florida, or Ohio? They have them in the off year elections. Kind've suspicious don't ya think?

By the way, I like how you copied and pasted from this article (http://www.townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/ac20041104.shtml) and made it seem like you thought of this stuff all on your own. Why don't we add plagiarism on too the lovely list of the republicans crimes.

Tom®
11-04-2004, 09:20 PM
Honestly i cant see how people can vote for bush.... is America that full of stupid rednecks? i must admit im pretty stupid for posting a thread in the wrong place but bush???

Baraka
11-04-2004, 09:21 PM
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ANN COULTER WHAT A NUTJOB AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AH

drobertson420
11-04-2004, 09:42 PM
"....So then, is John Kerry directly responsible for world hunger and international organized crime? "


Ummm,...Sure!

ASsman
11-04-2004, 10:20 PM
ANN COULTER
I'd bang the conservative out of her.

Schmeltz
11-04-2004, 10:39 PM
Again with the homosexual imagery, abdul? You need to head down the Rainbow Club and vent, man.

paulk
11-05-2004, 01:04 AM
I'd bang the conservative out of her.

I say we stick with imagery of homosexual rape scenes. I don't want to imagine Ann Coulter doing anything remotely sexual.

paulk
11-05-2004, 01:05 AM
4 more years, bud!

How about "4 years of bud"?

yeahwho
11-05-2004, 01:32 AM
By the way, I like how you copied and pasted from this article (http://www.townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/ac20041104.shtml) and made it seem like you thought of this stuff all on your own. Why don't we add plagiarism on too the lovely list of the republicans crimes.


This is officially the best thread in the BB General Political Discussion. (y)

krs5446
11-05-2004, 07:11 AM
So, if "libs dig" Saddam Hussien, then conservatives "dig" Adolf Hitler.

I know you are, but what am i? nice argument dipshit.

drobertson420
11-05-2004, 07:29 AM
How about "4 years of bud"?

I'm Down with that... :D

krs5446
11-05-2004, 07:32 AM
I'm Down with that... :D


yea, i like that idea! how about a wake and bake right now?

Whois
11-05-2004, 11:01 AM
whoa...there's alot of idiots on ignore in this thread

I know, isn't it GREAT :D (y)

drobertson420
11-05-2004, 07:53 PM
whoa...there's alot of idiots on ignore in this thread

I Dont see your name on the list.....how ever did you slip through?!...... :confused:

drobertson420
11-05-2004, 07:54 PM
whoa...there's alot of idiots on ignore in this thread


Sweet...Your Own Little "Third Reich" ;)

ASsman
11-05-2004, 10:23 PM
Well, that made little sense.

Rodie
11-06-2004, 02:52 PM
It's your country ur messing up so go ahead hick.

unfortunately it's my country too :( .

Ace42
11-07-2004, 01:41 PM
i feel sry for 49% of america who actually tried to make it a better place.

just under 30% of registered voters. Which is considerably less than 49% of people.

ASsman
11-07-2004, 01:50 PM
Majority obviously doesn't give a shit.

D_Raay
11-09-2004, 10:50 PM
I'd bang the conservative out of her.
It may take quite a few of us to get it all out of her. We may need to enlist some hard- core pipe laying errrrr, you know, the "N" word .


Nice catch Rodie

Ace42
11-09-2004, 11:12 PM
well whatever. then the 49% of the 30% that voted for kerry.

49% of the 60% which makes 30%...

However, put into perspective, 30% is not exactly a stunning endorsement. In a lot of US wars, a 30% non-military casualty rate is considered "acceptable"

By the US's own policies, you could nuke the whole country and everyone in it, and still be "justified."

Whois
11-10-2004, 10:34 AM
Well, that made little sense.

He's drunk again...

catatonic
11-10-2004, 10:55 AM
Your post was very unpleasant AbdulMohammed. It doesn't give me a reason to like you.

Rodie
11-10-2004, 12:35 PM
It may take quite a few of us to get it all out of her. We may need to enlist some hard- core pipe laying errrrr, you know, the "N" word .


Nice catch Rodie

Thanks, read it if you get a chance, it makes for a good laugh. Pulp Fiction rules btw