View Full Version : Warcrimes
American
11-17-2004, 11:14 PM
All of this talk about the false war crimes against the U.S. has brought me to an interesting question. Why doesn't anyone here condemn the war crimes committed by the Iraqis? If some of those crazy fuckers kidnap an innocent bystander and cut his/her head off on camera you blame the U.S. And Ace42, where is the Geneva Conventions in all of this? Even if this war is illegal like you claim it is (I don't find it illegal), that does not excuse these people from their crimes. You show nothing but disrespect to the ones that deserve the respect the most. All of you that act this way are just a bunch of idiots with blind hate for the U.S. and you will use anything to include outright lies and exaggerations to prove your distorted point.
Funkaloyd
11-17-2004, 11:37 PM
This question has been asked in various forms a million times. "Why weren't you liberals protesting when Saddam gassed the Kurds?" "If you don't support the terrorists, then why do you only attack Israel?" (etc.).
In this case, I think the issue isn't raised because everyone on the board―in fact almost everybody in "the Western world"―can agree that those masked terrorists we see in execution tapes are in the wrong. There's no controversy, and the subject is covered in the mainstream press anyway. However, if somebody were to come into General Political and state that "the ends justifies the means" and "they should do whatever they can to free their country" then I'm sure you'd see a lot of opposing views put forth by the local anti-war crowd.
American
11-17-2004, 11:43 PM
I respect your view and can easily see your point. I guess what bothers me is the fact that in the mainstream news, an innocent person getting their head cut off is shown in the same light as a soldier killing a person that was just trying to kill him due to the fact that these terrorists are strapping explosives on their bodies in hopes of taking out someone after they die or are injured. They know that our soldiers will search bodies for intellegence and this is a good opportunity to kill said soldier. And on this forum, these soldiers are attacked to no end while the murdering terrorists are excused. Do you understand where I am coming from?
American
11-18-2004, 12:10 AM
An article I found stated this. It's hard to argu against it!
ISLAMIC TERRORISTS KILL INNOCENT WOMAN
A video has surfaced showing the cold-blooded killing of Margaret Hassan, the woman who headed a humanitarian organization called CARE International. She lived in Iraq for 30 years and dedicated herself to helping Iraqis. The thanks for her tireless efforts came in the form of a bullet to the head. The video shows her blindfolded and wearing an orange jumpsuit. Yet, just as always, the terrorist-appeasing media refuses to acknowledge the following irrefutable facts:
Margaret Hassan was executed at point-blank range by terrorists.
These terrorists were Muslims, and thus can be accurately described as Islamic terrorists.
The vicious bastards that killed her believed that in doing so, their actions were approved by Allah, and will be rewarded in the after life.
Nowhere in any of the mainstream press coverage will you see her killers being described as anything less than "insurgents." Some of the coverage makes it sound like she died as the result of an accident or something. If it's not that, then it must be George Bush's fault for invading Iraq, angering the insurgency, and making them kill her. It's simply amazing that the leftist media in this country refuses to properly identify the enemy in the war on terror. They're too busy apologizing for the actions of the insurgents and doing stories about the "root causes" of terrorism.
Now ... think about this. A US Marine puts a bullet in the head of a terrorist, a terrorist he thought was playing dead. Just a day or two earlier this very same Marine lost a good friend to a booby-trapped body of a "dead" insurgent terrorist. Now that we know this, I'm prepared to give this Marine a pass. Good going, Marine. Now we see more outrage over what the Marine did than we see over the murder of this innocent, caring woman. What's wrong with this picture?
paulk
11-18-2004, 01:06 AM
George Washington was a war criminal.
Funkaloyd
11-18-2004, 02:01 AM
No, it's pretty easy to "argu" with that article. I mean:
terrorist-appeasing media
Puhlease (http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/EJ04Ak01.html).
Nowhere in any of the mainstream press coverage will you see her killers being described as anything less than "insurgents."
Has the mainstream press labeled the soldier involved in the killing of the wounded Iraqi either a "muderer" or a "war criminal?"
Do you understand where I am coming from?
Yes, and I agree, to an extent; I agree that terrorists executing civilians is different in scale to soldiers killing incapacitated militants. Though on the other hand, coalition atrocities are rarely covered in the press. This latest case is quite a one-off; the act was caught on camera, the reporter was aparently disgusted by what he saw, and he managed to make it a major story (through NBC, I believe). That rarely happens.
ASsman
11-18-2004, 08:29 AM
Yah we should catch all the terrorist. Oh that's what this war is SUPPOSE to be about. How can you prosecute all these people, you cannot prosecute a noun. You cannot prosecute "TERRORISM", you can charge leaders perhaps. Maybe we should start looking for Osama Bin Laden. This time for real real not for play play. Or you could try looking in the countries were the terrorist of 9/11 were from. Hmmm GOOD IDEA.
D_Raay
11-18-2004, 12:23 PM
Even if this war is illegal like you claim it is (I don't find it illegal)
http://deoxy.org/wc/warcrim2.htm
Initial Complaint
Charging
George Bush, J. Danforth Quayle, James Baker,
Richard Cheney, William Webster, Colin Powell,
Norman Schwarzkopf and Others to be named
With
Crimes Against Peace, War Crimes, Crimes Against
Humanity and Other Criminal Acts and High Crimes in
Violation of the Charter of the United Nations,
International Law, the Constitution of the United States
and Laws made in Pursuance Thereof.
International War Crimes Tribunal
United States War Crimes Against Iraq
Your "opinion" means nothing..
ASsman
11-18-2004, 12:23 PM
I think someone should release a country track,
War Crimes in the USA, lalal alalal .
Whois
11-18-2004, 12:47 PM
Why do you people keep feeding the trolls?
ASsman
11-18-2004, 01:03 PM
Because anything else would be un-American.
D_Raay
11-18-2004, 01:05 PM
Trolls have to eat too.....even if it's just wandering small children...
Whois
11-18-2004, 01:08 PM
Because anything else would be un-American.
Unamerica strikes again:
http://www.whatisdeepfried.com/STRIP_152.html
ASsman
11-18-2004, 01:39 PM
The July elections would provide that opportunity. The Nazis, sensing total victory, campaigned with fanatical energy. Hitler was now speaking to adoring German audiences of up to 100,000 at time. The phenomenon of large scale 'Führer worship' had begun. On July 31, the people voted and gave the Nazis 13,745,000 votes, 37% of the total, granting them 230 seats in the Reichstag. The Nazi party was now the largest and most powerful in Germany.
"I will employ my strength for the welfare of the German people, protect the Constitution and laws of the German people, conscientiously discharge the duties imposed on me, and conduct my affairs of office impartially and with justice to everyone." - Oath taken by Adolf Hitler, January 30, 1933.
When a teary eyed Adolf Hitler emerged from the presidential palace as the new chancellor, he was cheered by Nazis and their supporters who believed in him, not the constitution or the republic.
"We've done it!" Hitler shouted jubilantly to them.
Adolf Hitler, the new Chancellor of Germany, had no intention of abiding by the rules of democracy. He intended only to use those rules to legally establish himself as dictator as quickly as possible then begin the Nazi revolution.
On March 5, the last free elections were held. The people denied Hitler his majority, giving the Nazis only 44 per cent of the total vote, 17, 277,180. Despite massive propaganda and the brutal crackdown, the other parties held their own. The Center Party got over four million and the Social Democrats over seven million. The Communists lost votes but still got over four million.
As Hitler plotted to bring democracy to an end in Germany, Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels put together a brilliant public relations display at the official opening of the newly elected Reichstag.
In Germany there were now constant Nazi rallies, parades, marches and meetings amid the relentless propaganda of Goebbels and the omnipresent swastika. For those who remained there was an odd mixture of fear and optimism in the air.
Now, for the first time as dictator, Adolf Hitler turned his attention to the driving force which had propelled him into politics in the first place, his hatred of the Jews. It began with a simple boycott on April 1, 1933 and would end years later in the greatest tragedy in all of human history.
Just some history excerpts.
http://www.bofhlet.net/tasteless/13/elect.htm
American
11-19-2004, 12:09 AM
http://deoxy.org/wc/warcrim2.htm
Initial Complaint
Charging
George Bush, J. Danforth Quayle, James Baker,
Richard Cheney, William Webster, Colin Powell,
Norman Schwarzkopf and Others to be named
With
Crimes Against Peace, War Crimes, Crimes Against
Humanity and Other Criminal Acts and High Crimes in
Violation of the Charter of the United Nations,
International Law, the Constitution of the United States
and Laws made in Pursuance Thereof.
International War Crimes Tribunal
United States War Crimes Against Iraq
Your "opinion" means nothing..
ROFL!!!!!!!! Yea, this is a REAL CREDIBLE SOURCE!!!!! Do you fuckers even look at who is supplying this information? These war crimes are nothing more than made up bullshit. You are so desperate to find ANYTHING on paper that supports what you believe in that you use stupid shit like this.
http://deoxy.org/warnings.htm
Rosie Cotton
11-19-2004, 12:48 AM
ROFL!!!!!!!! Yea, this is a REAL CREDIBLE SOURCE!!!!! Do you fuckers even look at who is supplying this information? These war crimes are nothing more than made up bullshit. You are so desperate to find ANYTHING on paper that supports what you believe in that you use stupid shit like this.
http://deoxy.org/warnings.htm
What's your idea of credibility? Fox?
American
11-19-2004, 01:37 AM
What's your idea of credibility? Fox?
Please,,,,, as right winged as fox is, I would still pick it over a drug website with false documents. Not that I am against drugs or anything.
Funkaloyd
11-19-2004, 01:47 AM
Aha. Nuremburg Trials? Made up bullshit. Never happened.
Rosie Cotton
11-19-2004, 02:14 AM
Please,,,,, as right winged as fox is, I would still pick it over a drug website with false documents. Not that I am against drugs or anything.
Yeah, because on Fox they're just biased. They don't actually make shit up. And I have no doubt that you're on some sort of drugs. I wish I had whatever you're smoking. Being that deluded would be nice.
D_Raay
11-19-2004, 03:04 AM
Being that deluded would be nice.
I feel you Rosie, i wish i could be deluded too... You mush head right wingers think we enjoy seeing things for what they are don't you? This isn't about right versus left, terrorists versus Americans, morales versus realism, this is about right versus wrong. The right is wrong, hands down no question about it, the facts are all there, read between the lines and the right wing propaganda. I never thought I would see this nation head down the path is has taken and it shames and angers me greatly. I have two kids and I fear for their future. You may not think that it is relevant but to me it IS relevance..
So fuck you American and any other right wing mush head for making my days worrisome ones and impeding my children's future with your fear mongering rhetoric. As far as rhetoric goes the right is the world heavyweight champion of it..
Funkaloyd
11-19-2004, 03:29 AM
"If ignorance is bliss, then knock the smile off my face."
Rosie Cotton
11-19-2004, 03:58 AM
So fuck you American and any other right wing mush head for making my days worrisome ones and impeding my children's future with your fear mongering rhetoric. As far as rhetoric goes the right is the world heavyweight champion of it..
I would love to have kids one day, but I'm terrified of the world that I would have to raise them in. But hey, we do need future generations to fight when we are no longer able to
Ace42
11-19-2004, 07:25 AM
As far as rhetoric goes the right is the world heavyweight champion of it..
rhet·o·ric Audio pronunciation of "rhetoric" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (rtr-k)
n.
2. Skill in using language effectively and persuasively.
3.
1. A style of speaking or writing, especially the language of a particular subject: fiery political rhetoric.
2. Language that is elaborate, pretentious, insincere, or intellectually vacuous: His offers of compromise were mere rhetoric.
4. Verbal communication; discourse.
Let's be quite clear. It is only 3.2 that describes the right.
D_Raay
11-19-2004, 12:30 PM
Let's be quite clear. It is only 3.2 that describes the right.
Indeed...
American
11-20-2004, 12:55 AM
You mush head right wingers think we enjoy seeing things for what they are don't you?
And you fucking left wingers assume that everyone that disagrees with you are right wingers. Newsflash,,,, stop assuming. You are wrong. I should have taken a picture of my ballot so I could post it on here just prove all of you that assume wrong once and for all.
So fuck you American and any other right wing mush head for making my days worrisome ones and impeding my children's future with your fear mongering rhetoric. As far as rhetoric goes the right is the world heavyweight champion of it..
And Fuck You you fucking Pussy! Wash the sand out of your vagina and quit crying. Do think that you are the only person that has been worried about the future for their children? Do you think that you are the first generation to worry about the future for your children? I guess you would have had a nervous breakdown and committed suicide if you had kids during WWII when The WORLD was at war with planes bombing Hawaii and NUCLEAR WEAPONS BEING DROPPED! You self centered FUCK! History is there for a reason. Learn from it! Just think, if anti-war protesters were present during the Revolutionary War and had their way the same way they want it now, you would be sitting in whatever part of America you are in now, eating shitty food and drinking tea 24/7 with shitty weather. At least we would have the Queen!
Rosie Cotton
11-20-2004, 01:09 AM
And you fucking left wingers assume that everyone that disagrees with you are right wingers. Newsflash,,,, stop assuming. You are wrong. I should have taken a picture of my ballot so I could post it on here just prove all of you that assume wrong once and for all.
We don't assume. We know.
And Fuck You you fucking Pussy! Wash the sand out of your vagina and quit crying.
My, my. Such hostility. Take a xanax.
Do think that you are the only person that has been worried about the future for their children? Do you think that you are the first generation to worry about the future for your children? I guess you would have had a nervous breakdown and committed suicide if you had kids during WWII when The WORLD was at war with planes bombing Hawaii and NUCLEAR WEAPONS BEING DROPPED! You self centered FUCK!
So if someone is a liberal, and they're worried about their kids, it's self centered? What are you getting at here?
History is there for a reason. Learn from it!
Perhaps you should take your own advice, douche-nozzle.
Just think, if anti-war protesters were present during the Revolutionary War and had their way the same way they want it now, you would be sitting in whatever part of America you are in now, eating shitty food and drinking tea 24/7 with shitty weather. At least we would have the Queen!
First off, do you seriously believe that there was actually a war that EVERYBODY was gung-ho about? I doubt it. And how would being under British rule affect our weather? Meteorological patterns wouldn't change because we had a queen. Congrats, you have just become the first person on my ignore list. Bye.
American
11-20-2004, 01:57 AM
We don't assume. We know.
And where are the facts suppoting this opinion other than taking your word for it?
So if someone is a liberal, and they're worried about their kids, it's self centered? What are you getting at here?
I was commenting on the fact that he is making out to be the only person in history to live through a war or a time when the future looked scary. I would imagine living during a time when nuclear weapons WHERE BEING USED, not just something we knew that we had, was a little more scary.
Perhaps you should take your own advice, douche-nozzle.
What were you saying earlier about hostility and xanex? Oh, and congradulations. You win the coolest name I have ever been called award! I actually laughed out loud. I hope you don't mind if I use that in the future. I'll be sure and include a proper reference in APA format. Clever.
First off, do you seriously believe that there was actually a war that EVERYBODY was gung-ho about? I doubt it.
I'm glad that your doubt is the rule that we should all go by. I guess that you also believe that people back then had the same mentality as we do today. I mean, not much has changed since then.
And how would being under British rule affect our weather? Meteorological patterns wouldn't change because we had a queen.
Wow, 2 awards in one night. Congradulations! You have just won my "you take stuff way too seriously" award. This also nominates you for the "cannot recognize sarcasm award!"
Congrats, you have just become the first person on my ignore list. Bye.
Sorry to see that you crumble under pressure. Oh yea, thanks for letting me have the last word!
D_Raay
11-20-2004, 02:34 AM
I was commenting on the fact that he is making out to be the only person in history to live through a war or a time when the future looked scary. I would imagine living during a time when nuclear weapons WHERE BEING USED, not just something we knew that we had, was a little more scary.
Listen here, you cocksucker.. I don't normally get pissed off at other posters here but you have irked me now.. I am making out to be the first person in history to live through a war or a time when the future looked scary? Let me tell you something, when it comes to my kids future being compromised you can bet your "not right wing, but I will talk like one" ass that I will be scared for it whether or not some prick like you thinks I am a pussy for it. I am not someone to be trifled with physically. If you don't believe it that's just fine, pray you never have to find out. You pretend to be intelligent all the while spitting your ignorant uniformed arguments in my face while our soldiers butcher and slaughter the innocent. There is no denying it, no whitewashing it, and the immoral reprocussions of it will be felt by all. Even you, but you are to stupid to see that. So, pine on you asshat, but I will warn you brother stop talking to me as you have, it may be hazardous to your health..
American
11-20-2004, 02:55 AM
Listen here, you cocksucker.. I don't normally get pissed off at other posters here but you have irked me now.. I am making out to be the first person in history to live through a war or a time when the future looked scary? Let me tell you something, when it comes to my kids future being compromised you can bet your "not right wing, but I will talk like one" ass that I will be scared for it whether or not some prick like you thinks I am a pussy for it. I am not someone to be trifled with physically. If you don't believe it that's just fine, pray you never have to find out. You pretend to be intelligent all the while spitting your ignorant uniformed arguments in my face while our soldiers butcher and slaughter the innocent. There is no denying it, no whitewashing it, and the immoral reprocussions of it will be felt by all. Even you, but you are to stupid to see that. So, pine on you asshat, but I will warn you brother stop talking to me as you have, it may be hazardous to your health..
This post has let me see you in a different light D. I used to think that you were just another hate-filled idiot like Ace. I am now starting to actually have some respect for you. Even in your attack on me I sensed sencerity and respect on your part and I appreciate that. Even though we do not seem to agree on politics maybe we can agree on a mutual respect and start over.
I'm not going to respond to your points on the war as I don't feel that we will ever agree.
As for your feelings for your kids I will elaborate. My comments were not meant to take away any feelings that you have for your children. I respect you for caring so much about your kids. This country needs much more of that. I guess my point is this; the world has never been a safe place. At any point in history, people could have decided to stop having kids becuase the world seemed to be getting worse everyday. Everyday seemed worse than the day before. If they would have done this there would be no D. History tells us that while kids are weak and in need to be protected from evil things, they also grow up to be strong and are able to adapt and overcome these evils. It also tells us that some grow up to be a major part of the problems. Do you see where I am going with this? No matter what you do, your kid's future is going to be compromised. That is reality and it is a reality that has always existed. Unfortunately, I feel that is something that has always existed and will always exist no matter what so I don't feel that it should be used in an argument. Am I making sense? And yes, I am a huge hypocrite when it comes to this subject. My wife has been on me to have a kid for 5 years now and this very subject is what holds me back. I know all about the fear that you experience. I just don't use it in an argument to justfy something or prove it wrong. But hey, free speech gives you the right too.
On a different note, I'm not a little guy either.
Rosie Cotton
11-20-2004, 05:47 AM
Christ. i couldn't do it. I just couldn't do it.
And where are the facts suppoting this opinion other than taking your word for it?
Facts? Only everything you've ever posted.
I was commenting on the fact that he is making out to be the only person in history to live through a war or a time when the future looked scary. I would imagine living during a time when nuclear weapons WHERE BEING USED, not just something we knew that we had, was a little more scary.
I don't think that's what he meant. Maybe whenever you have kids you'll understand a little better.
What were you saying earlier about hostility and xanex? Oh, and congradulations. You win the coolest name I have ever been called award! I actually laughed out loud. I hope you don't mind if I use that in the future. I'll be sure and include a proper reference in APA format. Clever.
Yay! I won an award! were's my damn trophy?
I wasn't being hostile. Well, calling you a douche-nozzle might have been a little bit, but that was nothing in comparison to your "fuck" fest. And I don't want credit. I want a muthafucking royalty check!
FYI-You mispelled "xanax".
I'm glad that your doubt is the rule that we should all go by. I guess that you also believe that people back then had the same mentality as we do today. I mean, not much has changed since then.
Please, do you honestly believe that there has actually been a war that everybody approved of? Wartime dissention hasn't always been as accepted as it is now. Hell, it's not even accepted now in many places.
Wow, 2 awards in one night. Congradulations! You have just won my "you take stuff way too seriously" award. This also nominates you for the "cannot recognize sarcasm award!"
So, I can't say that you are conservative, despite the fact that in every post you argue with the people with a liberal mindset, but because of one line in one post I made, I "take stuff way to seriously"? That seems more than atad hypocritical. I think I should win the "can recognize stupidity" award
Sorry to see that you crumble under pressure. Oh yea, thanks for letting me have the last word!
Damn, sorry to disappoint, sweetie. I just love to hate you.
ASsman
11-20-2004, 08:29 AM
KAPOWELL!
My warcrimes thread... totally kicks more ass.
Not that I am against drugs or anything.Obviously.
Kind of ironic to see your funny little President declaring war on Narcoterrerists, considering his (sniff) track record.
Just think, if anti-war protesters were present during the Revolutionary War and had their way the same way they want it now, you would be sitting in whatever part of America you are in now, eating shitty food and drinking tea 24/7 with shitty weather. At least we would have the Queen! Hahahahahaahhahaa. You are the dumbest dumbass that ever found his way out of Dumbville! You crack me right up. I like you.
On a different note, I'm not a little guy either. But you do have a tiny little brain.
vBulletin® v3.6.7, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.