View Full Version : WONDER WHY YOU HAVEN'T HEARD ABOUT THIS?
American
11-18-2004, 12:22 AM
If you use this link (http://www.usatoday.com/news/graphics/phantom_fury/flash.htm) to visit the USA Today website you will be treated to a flash presentation of several pictures taken during the siege of Fallujah. Picture number two in this presentation shows 40 vials in boxes labeled "Sarin." That's Sarin gas, my friends. One drop of this stuff on your skin can kill you. The boxes have Cyrillic and German characters on them, indicating they may have come from our good friends the Russians or the Germans. The caption under the photo reads "Marines discovered 40 vials of suspected Sarin gas while searching a house in Fallujah, Iraq. It was secreted in a briefcase hidden in a truck in the courtyard of the house."
So ... there you go. Weapons of mass destruction. Chemical weapons. This Sarin gas could, with an effective application, kill thousands. And where do they find it? In a briefcase! A briefcase in a car trunk. And you wonder why our troops have had some difficulty finding Saddam's weapons? You still think inspections could have worked? Yeah, sure they would. The inspectors were going to look in every car trunk and every briefcase in Iraq.
What you see in that picture is proof that the only way to even come close to neutralizing the threat that Saddam posed was to remove him from power. Nothing else was going to work.
Meanwhile ... just watch the critics whistle past this one. If you don't mention the vials of Sarin gas, they just don't exist ... do they?
This may turn out to be a Sarin gas test kit (http://www.canada.com/national/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=11a4b04a-d0ee-4a42-8770-6fbc41951bf1). As Drudge would say...developing...
phinkasaurus
11-18-2004, 12:45 AM
yeah you ain't kidding.
They found that the 11th and a google search brought up 4 matches, all from blogs.
It's not on any news outlet I frequent, NY times, NPR, CNN, FOX news.. none. Why have we not heard about this? Wouldn't Bush have thown this in the worlds face?
phinkasaurus
11-18-2004, 01:09 AM
plus the u.s has THE LARGEST STOCKPILE OF WEAPONS and THE LARGEST MILITARY IN THE WORLD!
10,600the total number of u.s. nuclear warheads in 2002 was estimated around 10,600 (http://www.thebulletin.org/article_nn.php?art_ofn=mj02norris)
Funkaloyd
11-18-2004, 01:43 AM
Damn those Russians and Germans (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A52241-2002Dec29¬Found=true)!
Rosie Cotton
11-18-2004, 02:58 AM
Yeah, one picture is all the proof I need. Thanks so much for that. I have changed my mind about the war. Because one picture of some vials of sarin gas (which was never mentioned in any of the major news outlets, that I am aware of) is unequivocal proof that Saddam also had nuclear warheads. Thanks! I owe you one, man.
drobertson420
11-18-2004, 07:05 AM
Sorry,but.....http://www.soldierofthemind.com/archives/2004/11/12/sarin_gas_not_found_in_fallujah.html
Of course, read the name of the site.....and the tagline.... :rolleyes:
racer5.0stang
11-18-2004, 09:41 AM
dumbass....."suspected" means it's not sarin. If it were sarin they would just fucking say "sarin". George Bush would be the 1st one telling the world WMDs were found. Shit...he already said "we found 'em!" once. Stupid fucker....I can't wait to see the look on your fascist face when the draft comes. Go enlist if you really support the war. Fight for my "freedom" in Fallujah.
What makes you think that Kerry, if elected, would not have started the draft?
It would seem like that as much as we wine a/b free speech, the media of all people, would state how something is or isn't regardless of what the information is or who it would upset.
ASsman
11-18-2004, 09:49 AM
Draft will have the same effect of the draft in Vietnam. We are already fucked in Iraq, having a citizens army will not help.
infidel
11-18-2004, 11:02 AM
I don't think many would disagree that Saddam had chemical and bio weapons at one time.
Most all chemical and bio weapons have a limited shelf life and their toxicity was degraded to the point that they were harmless back in 1995.
That's why the media isn't reporting it, there's nothing to report.
Whois
11-18-2004, 11:08 AM
I will assume this is another of a series of mindless posts by Amurikan that proves we're all wrong and god wants us to kill furreners.
phinkasaurus
11-18-2004, 11:20 AM
It would seem like that as much as we wine a/b free speech, the media of all people, would state how something is or isn't regardless of what the information is or who it would upset.
you would think so, but then look at the blanket silience the media gave us in the build up to war. or right after 9/11, where was the discussion about our forign policy decisions that might have had something to do with that?
yes friend, our media is for profit like every other business, so it does need to make sure some people are happy...
Has anybody heard about the "new type" of Nuclear weapon that the Russians, under the leadership of President Vladimir Putin (ex-KGB), are developing?? I only heard a small bit on the radio yesterday. Don't you think that should be on the agenda of the Bush administration?? Oh, wait a second, isn't there a link between the Russians and Iran?? Hmm...makes me wonder?
Whois
11-18-2004, 01:19 PM
Has anybody heard about the "new type" of Nuclear weapon that the Russians, under the leadership of President Vladimir Putin (ex-KGB), are developing?? I only heard a small bit on the radio yesterday. Don't you think that should be on the agenda of the Bush administration?? Oh, wait a second, isn't there a link between the Russians and Iran?? Hmm...makes me wonder?
"Pooty-poot is my bestest buddy don'tchaknow." - Gee Dubya Bush
"Pooty-poot is my bestest buddy don'tchaknow." - Gee Dubya Bush
Nice (y) :D
Paul Nice
11-18-2004, 08:52 PM
If you use this link (http://www.usatoday.com/news/graphics/phantom_fury/flash.htm) to visit the USA Today website you will be treated to a flash presentation of several pictures taken during the siege of Fallujah. Picture number two in this presentation shows 40 vials in boxes labeled "Sarin." That's Sarin gas, my friends. One drop of this stuff on your skin can kill you. The boxes have Cyrillic and German characters on them, indicating they may have come from our good friends the Russians or the Germans. The caption under the photo reads "Marines discovered 40 vials of suspected Sarin gas while searching a house in Fallujah, Iraq. It was secreted in a briefcase hidden in a truck in the courtyard of the house."
So ... there you go. Weapons of mass destruction. Chemical weapons. This Sarin gas could, with an effective application, kill thousands. And where do they find it? In a briefcase! A briefcase in a car trunk. And you wonder why our troops have had some difficulty finding Saddam's weapons? You still think inspections could have worked? Yeah, sure they would. The inspectors were going to look in every car trunk and every briefcase in Iraq.
What you see in that picture is proof that the only way to even come close to neutralizing the threat that Saddam posed was to remove him from power. Nothing else was going to work.
Meanwhile ... just watch the critics whistle past this one. If you don't mention the vials of Sarin gas, they just don't exist ... do they?
This may turn out to be a Sarin gas test kit (http://www.canada.com/national/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=11a4b04a-d0ee-4a42-8770-6fbc41951bf1). As Drudge would say...developing...
Irrelevant. Even with ten warehouses full of sarin gas, Saddam would not have been a threat to the United States, thus we had no reason to conquer Iraq. Iraq is a slapstick blunder that hurt more than it helped. We will be LUCKY if, in ten years, Iraq is led by as benign a man as Saddam (by benign I mean with regards to his threat to the United States). A secular dictator who was in no way a kooky Islamofascist zealot. He was a brutal, selfish despot, yes - but that same self centeredness made it so he wouldn't attack the US - it would be suicide. He was powerhungry - attacking the US would mean the destruction of his instruments of his power and the elimination of his power itself.
Paul Nice
11-18-2004, 08:53 PM
plus the u.s has THE LARGEST STOCKPILE OF WEAPONS and THE LARGEST MILITARY IN THE WORLD!
10,600the total number of u.s. nuclear warheads in 2002 was estimated around 10,600 (http://www.thebulletin.org/article_nn.php?art_ofn=mj02norris)
Honestly - thank god for that.
auntyvenom
11-18-2004, 08:54 PM
I never said that Mr. Assumption. How the fuck did you get that out of my post? The draft is coming....it doesn't matter who is President. But we can all blame Bush for the draft. It's his fault we're in a war we shouldn't be fighting. No WMDs in Iraq. No 9/11 connection. No nukes. But dumbfuck Republicans think 1,200 US soldiers getting killed in Iraq is still worth it.
Right on.
ASsman
11-18-2004, 09:47 PM
I KNOW WHY! BECAUSE THE TITLE IS IN ALL CAPS! JESUS!
Cashew
11-18-2004, 09:52 PM
Notice all those labels are in english, german, or russian, WE GAVE THEM THE SHIT! THAT'S IN HISTORY BOOKS.
Just not the ones they gave you in 8th grade.
Rosie Cotton
11-18-2004, 09:54 PM
Notice all those labels are in english, german, or russian, WE GAVE THEM THE SHIT! THAT'S IN HISTORY BOOKS.
Just not the ones they gave you in 8th grade.
He's not gonna listen. This more than justifies the war in his two-dimensional little mind.
vBulletin® v3.6.7, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.