Ali
12-22-2004, 04:18 AM
EVER SINCE THE US shut down the GPS system for commercial navigation during the Bosnian crisis, Europe has wanted its own version of satellite navigation. But as soon as Europe's solution, Galileo, is given the go-ahead, the White House accidentally gives anonymous briefings over the supposed threat it represents.
Why? It's just a trade war. The USA simply doesn't see why Europe should have a better version of GPS than it has. (See here (http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=8609).) So what happens? First of all, America makes noises about the fact that China has joined the Galileo project.
Isn't it funny how the US only selectively notices that China is still a communist regime? The INQ can recall being astonished to hear from a taxi driver in Las Vegas that Qualcomm had given 'military secrets' to Red China. It turned out he was complaining about sales of CDMA handset to China. How bizarre is that?
Anyway, after the Clinton administration abandoned the practice of deliberately degrading the accuracy of civilian GPS signals (a practice known as 'selective availability') back in May 2000, the Bush administration has developed a new spin.
According to the anonymous source, President Bush has responded by instructing the US Department of Defense to develop plans to disable an enemy's access to the US navigational satellites and to similar systems operated by others "in certain areas". This is clearly aimed at Galileo.
Although such action "would come under only the most remarkable circumstances", it's a clear threat. Of course Europe can claim that Galileo has no military applications until it is blue in the face. But Bush has merely found another axis of all evil - anyone who puts a satellite into space. Gosh, doesn't that conveniently include the French (http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=20312)?
Uncle Sam Fighting dirty, for a change?
Why? It's just a trade war. The USA simply doesn't see why Europe should have a better version of GPS than it has. (See here (http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=8609).) So what happens? First of all, America makes noises about the fact that China has joined the Galileo project.
Isn't it funny how the US only selectively notices that China is still a communist regime? The INQ can recall being astonished to hear from a taxi driver in Las Vegas that Qualcomm had given 'military secrets' to Red China. It turned out he was complaining about sales of CDMA handset to China. How bizarre is that?
Anyway, after the Clinton administration abandoned the practice of deliberately degrading the accuracy of civilian GPS signals (a practice known as 'selective availability') back in May 2000, the Bush administration has developed a new spin.
According to the anonymous source, President Bush has responded by instructing the US Department of Defense to develop plans to disable an enemy's access to the US navigational satellites and to similar systems operated by others "in certain areas". This is clearly aimed at Galileo.
Although such action "would come under only the most remarkable circumstances", it's a clear threat. Of course Europe can claim that Galileo has no military applications until it is blue in the face. But Bush has merely found another axis of all evil - anyone who puts a satellite into space. Gosh, doesn't that conveniently include the French (http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=20312)?
Uncle Sam Fighting dirty, for a change?