PDA

View Full Version : Bush will hail "success" in Europe


D_Raay
02-26-2005, 02:54 PM
President Bush will hail his trip to Europe as a resounding success. He hails everything he does as a resounding success regardless of the evidence to the contrary. All politicians do that.

Lest you be spun by the spin, note that he comes home with only one tangible result – an agreement by NATO to assist in training Iraqi forces, and a tepid assist it will be. Two of the NATO countries have agreed to supply one man each. Nearly all of the training will take place in Europe.

Well, such as it is, it's a good thing, as our own efforts to train Iraqis don't seem to be going so well.

Nevertheless, Bush cannot resist acting as if God appointed him schoolmaster of the world. He lectured everybody in sight. You, Europeans, should not lift the arms embargo against China (they are anyway), and you should stop being so soft on Iran. You should forget all my past insults and get on the Iraqi bandwagon.

They won't forget, and they won't get on a bandwagon that is stuck in the mire.

Hey, you Russians, listen up. You should be more democratic, and you should stop taking up for Iran. You, Iranians, you stop your nuclear-power program. You, Syrians, get out of Lebanon.

Mr. Bush has gotten Teddy Roosevelt's dictum exactly upside down. He shouts loudly and carries a small stick.

Let me put into perspective just how small a stick he carries. The European Union, in all but military power, is itself a superpower. It has more people than we do, and it has a larger gross domestic product. Its currency, the Euro, is very strong, and our currency, the dollar, is very weak.

Russia remains a military superpower, and its economy is growing faster than ours. It has recently undertaken an effort to modernize its nuclear strategic forces and even today has more than enough to blow us away. Furthermore, it recently signed a strategic defense agreement with China.

As to that part of the world, China and India, both with more than a billion people each, have rapidly growing economies. China, in particular, has undertaken a military buildup, and, of course, all three – Russia, India and China – are nuclear powers. If Bush ever looked past his immediate political goals, he might foresee a future tripartite alliance that would mean big trouble for America.

In short, we are not the world's only remaining superpower, as the Washington cliché says, and if Bush could see past his ego, he would recognize that. Our economy is shaky. Federal, corporate and private debt is in the trillions, and Japan and China could wreck our economy just by dumping the debt paper they hold on the market.

One should remember what Osama bin Laden said. He did not say he would conquer us and convert us all to Islam. He said he would bankrupt us. If Bush gets us further mired in the Middle East by attacking Iran and Syria, as he seems likely to do, bin Laden might very well succeed. War is always a drain on the economy. War always produces death, destruction, debt and taxes.

In short, real-world circumstances require careful, skillful and quiet diplomacy – not bombast. I fear, however, that we have put in place the wrong administration at the wrong time. Science, economic smarts, diplomatic skills and military experience are woefully in short supply in the Bush administration, which is filled with academics, spinners and ideologues.

The rise or fall of empires in the final days always depends on the right or wrong decisions made by the leadership. As American peons, there is nothing we can do but pray that God will intervene and make Bush give up hubris like he once did whiskey.

ASsman
02-26-2005, 03:27 PM
I moan when I carry my stick.

Atleast now he can say he "tried".

enree erzweglle
02-26-2005, 06:43 PM
You could have stopped before the "in Europe" part. He'll always declare success no matter the circumstances.

infidel
02-27-2005, 06:43 AM
This doesn't look very sucessful to me. Seems like AF One's wheel barely left the ground before this was signed. But at least bush got France to send one guy.

Iran, Russia Sign Key Nuclear Fuel Deal

TEHRAN (Reuters) - Russia and Iran signed a nuclear fuel supply deal long opposed by Washington on Sunday which will pave the way for the Islamic state to start up its first atomic power plant next year, state media reported.
The agreement, signed by the two countries' nuclear energy chiefs at the Bushehr atomic reactor in southern Iran, came as Tehran faced heightened pressure from the United States, which accuses it of secretly developing nuclear weapons.

Iran denies the charge and has received strong backing from Moscow, which is keen to extend its commercial interest in Iran's drive to produce electricity from nuclear reactors.

"This is a very important incident in the ties between the two countries and in the near future a number of Russian experts will be sent to Bushehr to equip the power station," Iranian state television quoted Alexander Rumyantsev, head of Russia's Federal Atomic Energy Agency, as saying.

http://olympics.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=worldNews&storyID=7748691

synch
02-27-2005, 06:58 AM
Is it just me or is building a nuclear power reactor and trying to make nuclear weapons a completely different thing?

It just sounds a hell of a lot like the US wants everyone to use hamster driven energy sources while they sport nuclear driven submarines.

infidel
02-27-2005, 11:38 AM
It must irk the bush administration to no end that an oil rich country would develop more sustainable power rather than burn their resources up as fast as we do.

yeahwho
02-27-2005, 12:36 PM
It must irk the bush administration to no end that an oil rich country would develop more sustainable power rather than burn their resources up as fast as we do.

Hear dat...+ they have wonderful carpets and pistachios. GWB would sure like to get his paws on them carpets and pistachios.

Ace42
02-28-2005, 01:43 AM
All of the pistachios I eat come from Iran. Incidently, according to the BBC news right this second, the UK spends more on "fair trade" products than any other country. Awareness has increased by 175% in 18-25 year olds.

Qdrop
02-28-2005, 08:04 AM
It must irk the bush administration to no end that an oil rich country would develop more sustainable power rather than burn their resources up as fast as we do.

so are liberal for or against nuclear power?.....

i seem to recall a rather tumultuous past between the liberals (particulary the greens) and nuclear power plants in the US.....(fear of meltdowns, toxic waste, radiation leaks, ect)...

Echewta
02-28-2005, 04:06 PM
Well, when you look at some of the problems with nuke power in the past, it results in cutting corners, poor design, loose goverment regulations etc., i.e. GREED. From what I've been reading about the new designs for nuke power, its not so bad, speaking as liberal as I can. At the moment, I rather have nuclear power than coal or oil.

ILLMIX
02-28-2005, 06:59 PM
What D-Raay said is very true, America (GWB) forgets that quite a lot of the world hates the US of A and only put on smiley face when he's around because they know he's stupid enough to believe everything is rosy for the US when its not.
Does he really think France, Germany, Russia and Italy will ever be on the USA's side for N E thing. NO!!!
We in the UK do not quite know what Tony Blair's plan is with USA as he seems to be sucking up to Bush but do remember that where as George W has worked his way up the political ladder through shaddy dealings and some fortnate relatives Mr Blair is a very well educated man with a lot of solid rough training in diplomats.......so even though it seems like he's up bush's arse he must know what an Oaf he is. Doesn't G Bush remind you of those big kids at school who used to threaten smaller children but if some jocks came up to him then he'd shit his pants. and they know that so the Sporty kids use the bully for their own needs. ;)

infidel
02-28-2005, 07:05 PM
so are liberal for or against nuclear power?.....

i seem to recall a rather tumultuous past between the liberals (particulary the greens) and nuclear power plants in the US.....(fear of meltdowns, toxic waste, radiation leaks, ect)... Most of the libs I know are pro-nuke. Seems that most of the anti-nuke crowd are only anti if one is being built near them = NIMBYs (Not In My Back Yard)

Qdrop
03-01-2005, 07:56 AM
Most of the libs I know are pro-nuke. Seems that most of the anti-nuke crowd are only anti if one is being built near them = NIMBYs (Not In My Back Yard)

very true, sir.....

Qdrop
03-01-2005, 07:57 AM
At the moment, I rather have nuclear power than coal or oil.

agreed.

ILLMIX
03-02-2005, 11:23 AM
Why does America think that everyone/ all the countries should be like them and agree with whatever they do....or else!!! :eek:

ASsman
03-02-2005, 11:43 AM
Because we invented freedom.

And WHUT!!?

Ali
03-02-2005, 04:17 PM
Because we invented freedom.
God Bless America (http://www.nsgtmo.navy.mil/)