Watch Bush Lie!

[QueenAdrock]

Here: http://homepage.mac.com/njenson/movies/notconcerned.html

God, what a freakin' asshole. :rolleyes:

[D_Raay]

I remember that... You see the faces he makes? This sort of tactic, unheard of in an intellectual world, actually works to some degree in ours. The fan base mirrors Sisko so you can see what I am getting at.

[sam i am]

I remember that... You see the faces he makes? This sort of tactic, unheard of in an intellectual world, actually works to some degree in ours. The fan base mirrors Sisko so you can see what I am getting at.

The quote is : "I'm not really that concerned about him (Osama)"

Concerned is defined in the dictionary as : "interested or affected. Anxious; troubled; disturbed." American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, published 1979.

I'm actually glad he's not "concerned" about Osama, but would rather Bush was "making sure he was dead."

Might be better for Bush not to be too "concerned," if you hate him, because you already think he's not that smart and doesn't have much intellectual capacity to keep himself upright and breathing while thinking as well. :)

[yeahwho]

I understand why you wouldn't want to be critical (http://www.aclu.org/spyfiles/). I'm probably slow on the uptake but I still seem to think everything isn't quite on the level with this current administration. Mr. Bush is off bubble most all the time.

It's odd the things the Bush administration is concerned with. While OBL may not be of much concern to this administration gathering reams of information on law abiding US citizens (http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/18/politics/18protest.html?ex=1279339200&en=14724d069c3bf6a5&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss) has become commonplace and continues to baffle everyone I associate with. Of course I notice many folks just don't seem to be too concerned at all about their first amendment rights and privacy.

Responding to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union, the DOJ (http://www.usdoj.gov/civilliberties.htm) admits to having collected at least 3,500 pages of documents on Bush administration critics — with almost 1,200 relating to the A.C.L.U. itself, and almost 2,400 regarding Greenpeace. "Peace Creeps" (http://www.aclu.org/SafeandFree/SafeandFree.cfm?ID=18784&c=206) seem to be a major concern for President Bush.

I don't know for sure why I'm concerned with this, it's just business as usual for the FBI.

If only the FBI had been so diligent in collecting information about the activities of some Saudi nationals in the US prior to September 11th. But then, given their track record on being able to sort out what they have on the ACLU now, it would have been September 11th, 2002 before anyone at the bureau would have figured out what was happening anyhow.

I pretty sure they're getting a grip on the ACLU's and Greenpeace's WMD. I'm going to try and sleep now.

[QueenAdrock]

The quote is : "I'm not really that concerned about him (Osama)"

Concerned is defined in the dictionary as : "interested or affected. Anxious; troubled; disturbed." American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, published 1979.

I'm actually glad he's not "concerned" about Osama, but would rather Bush was "making sure he was dead."

Might be better for Bush not to be too "concerned," if you hate him, because you already think he's not that smart and doesn't have much intellectual capacity to keep himself upright and breathing while thinking as well. :)

I gotta disagree. It doesn't matter who the president is, if it was a Democratic president, I'd still say that he should be concerned. I think it's one of our number-one priorities to capture Osama Bin Laden.

It made my blood boil to hear that he's not too "concerned" about Osama Bin Laden, because my friend's father died in the Pentagon. My boyfriend's cousin also lost many of her close friends in the Towers. I felt so incredibly bad for the both of them, and the one time I did stand behind our president was on that tragic day, when he told us that "Those people who knocked down our buildings will all hear us soon." But, I agree with Kerry. He took his eye off the ball. He SHOULD be concerned with Osama, because he's the mastermind behind these plots. He will very well come up with many more plots that will kill hundreds or thousands more; we NEED to be concerned with taking him out. I do believe that someone will step up to plate to take his position once Osama is gone, but for the time being, we need to focus on #1 and not people like Saddam Hussein, because he was not a threat at the time. We need to look at our biggest priorities first, and deal with them one by one, and not jump to #47 because it's in his best interests.

The only thing that made my blood boil more than to hear that he wasn't "concerned" about the biggest terrorist this world has ever seen was to hear him lie and say he had never said such a thing, during the debates...just because it's important for Americans to think he's doing a good job when it really matters.

[D_Raay]

I gotta disagree. It doesn't matter who the president is, if it was a Democratic president, I'd still say that he should be concerned. I think it's one of our number-one priorities to capture Osama Bin Laden.

It made my blood boil to hear that he's not too "concerned" about Osama Bin Laden, because my friend's father died in the Pentagon. My boyfriend's cousin also lost many of her close friends in the Towers. I felt so incredibly bad for the both of them, and the one time I did stand behind our president was on that tragic day, when he told us that "Those people who knocked down our buildings will all hear us soon." But, I agree with Kerry. He took his eye off the ball. He SHOULD be concerned with Osama, because he's the mastermind behind these plots. He will very well come up with many more plots that will kill hundreds or thousands more; we NEED to be concerned with taking him out. I do believe that someone will step up to plate to take his position once Osama is gone, but for the time being, we need to focus on #1 and not people like Saddam Hussein, because he was not a threat at the time. We need to look at our biggest priorities first, and deal with them one by one, and not jump to #47 because it's in his best interests.

The only thing that made my blood boil more than to hear that he wasn't "concerned" about the biggest terrorist this world has ever seen was to hear him lie and say he had never said such a thing, during the debates...just because it's important for Americans to think he's doing a good job when it really matters.

Unless of course Osama Bin Laden is , in fact, already dead which is a possibility.

[QueenAdrock]

Yeah. How sad would it be if he died because of his kidney problems, and not because we shot him in the face?

We'd be such failures. :(

[sam i am]

I understand why you wouldn't want to be critical (http://www.aclu.org/spyfiles/). I'm probably slow on the uptake but I still seem to think everything isn't quite on the level with this current administration. Mr. Bush is off bubble most all the time.

It's odd the things the Bush administration is concerned with. While OBL may not be of much concern to this administration gathering reams of information on law abiding US citizens (http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/18/politics/18protest.html?ex=1279339200&en=14724d069c3bf6a5&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss) has become commonplace and continues to baffle everyone I associate with. Of course I notice many folks just don't seem to be too concerned at all about their first amendment rights and privacy.

Responding to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union, the DOJ (http://www.usdoj.gov/civilliberties.htm) admits to having collected at least 3,500 pages of documents on Bush administration critics — with almost 1,200 relating to the A.C.L.U. itself, and almost 2,400 regarding Greenpeace. "Peace Creeps" (http://www.aclu.org/SafeandFree/SafeandFree.cfm?ID=18784&c=206) seem to be a major concern for President Bush.

I don't know for sure why I'm concerned with this, it's just business as usual for the FBI.

If only the FBI had been so diligent in collecting information about the activities of some Saudi nationals in the US prior to September 11th. But then, given their track record on being able to sort out what they have on the ACLU now, it would have been September 11th, 2002 before anyone at the bureau would have figured out what was happening anyhow.

I pretty sure they're getting a grip on the ACLU's and Greenpeace's WMD. I'm going to try and sleep now.

I can't believe Documad isn't posting on this thread after this attack on the FBI. Guess she's just a hypocrite!