View Full Version : How much value do you put on sex?
Kid Presentable
10-17-2005, 09:15 AM
If you were in a relationship and your significant other was involved in an accident that disfigured or crippled them, and you had to live without the typical sex life, could you?
By typical I don't mean, frequency, I mean not having to use a lolly stick to hold it up, or butter to get it in.
I mean, if you had to go through this awkward new learning phase, and share your partners pride in something that may make you uncomfortable. Something that could be so unfulfilling, it would make you want to leave.
Couldn't be any worse than wiping their arse I spose.
Thoughts you lot?
Knuckles
10-17-2005, 09:17 AM
I think I could get through it.
I'd probably spend a few thousand dollars a year on porn though.
paul jones
10-17-2005, 09:18 AM
Couldn't be any worse than wiping their arse I spose.
Thoughts you lot?
as long as she didn't have the runs,then that would ok
ToucanSpam
10-17-2005, 09:19 AM
In my opinion, sex is part of a relationship, but it hopefully isnt the foundation. Lack of sex shouldn't disturb a very strong relationship, but I don't think I know enough to say much else.
I guess it depends on the relationship.
Kid Presentable
10-17-2005, 09:20 AM
I think I could get through it.
I'd probably spend a few thousand dollars a year on porn though.
Yeah me too. I guess porn would be the key. That and some water wings. (y)
I remember hearing about a girl who's husband was paralysed in a boating accident, and they managed to have sex again. While he was proud of himself for being able to do it, and to a degree she was proud of him too, the whole thing just made her skin crawl.
If I were paralysed, it would certainly put pressure on my other half. I'd feel bad as fuck for her.
paul jones
10-17-2005, 09:21 AM
what's that film with Sherilyn Fenn?
Ah,just remembred, Boxing Helena
anyone seen it? is it any good? do you see her baps?
I'd like to think that I would have permission to get my rocks off elsewhere as long as I didn't bring some disease home.
ms.peachy
10-17-2005, 09:33 AM
This has happened to a good friend of mine. Her husband was severely injured in a motorcycle accident, and paralysed from the waist down. Their whole lives certainly changed, not just their sex life. But, 12 years on, they are still married. And, it would seem, happily. So I have to assume they have found something that works for them.
I know I am going off on a tangent here, but this is one of those situations where I really think prostitution is maybe not such an evil thing. (I'm well aware many will disagree with that statement, but so be it.) I really feel for a man or woman who may have a very loving, caring realtionship with a spouse who is unable to have sex, who may want to use the physical services provided by a professional, with no emotional involvement. I'm not suggestion it's ideal, only that maybe it's not so bad.
mickill
10-17-2005, 09:38 AM
I'd be careful repeating that around your husband. He just might try pushing you in front of a bus to cripple you one day or something. I'm just saying, that's music to most men's ears. Not mine per se...but most.
ms.peachy
10-17-2005, 09:44 AM
I'd be careful repeating that around your husband. He just might try pushing you in front of a bus to cripple you one day or something. I'm just saying, that's music to most men's ears. Not mine per se...but most.
Oh, if he had it in mind to screw around, heaven knows he's got the opportunity - I mean, the man's 'away on business' like 20% of the time. Often in countries of the former Soviet Union, where there are hookers in all the hotel bars and lobbies, just waiting. How would I ever know?
mickill
10-17-2005, 09:45 AM
I think we should just trust him.
ms.peachy
10-17-2005, 09:45 AM
I think we should just trust him.
(y) that's been my plan all along.
beastieangel01
10-17-2005, 09:57 AM
I'd stick around. I would probably have to do a lot more to make it enjoyable but it's the kind of thing that I'm not going to have a problem doing if I love the person.
bigblu89
10-17-2005, 10:12 AM
If you were in a relationship and your significant other was involved in an accident that disfigured or crippled them, and you had to live without the typical sex life, could you?
How would this change from my current sex life?
OK, Just making a little jokey joke there, I don't think I would have a problem. I personally would be more upset about her not being able to have children then me not being able to get my rocks off.
As long as I have my right hand, I'll be able to get myself off. But her not being able to have kids this young in life, would be a real crusher for me.
Knuckles
10-17-2005, 10:13 AM
I prefer my left.
ToucanSpam
10-17-2005, 10:15 AM
I prefer my left.
Kid Presentable
10-17-2005, 10:19 AM
I prefer my left.
Oh, so that's why you're called 'Knuckles'.
Lex Diamonds
10-17-2005, 10:20 AM
I prefer my left.
cosmo105
10-17-2005, 10:55 AM
I'd stick around. I would probably have to do a lot more to make it enjoyable but it's the kind of thing that I'm not going to have a problem doing if I love the person.
same.
g-mile7
10-17-2005, 10:56 AM
sex is overated
Kid Presentable
10-17-2005, 10:56 AM
same.
Don't get me wrong. The question is rhetorical, I'm just wondering what the idea makes you think about.
cosmo105
10-17-2005, 11:02 AM
i suppose it would be difficult at first and maybe i'd even mourn a little...i mean, i enjoy the act. i love it. but it's not what a relationship is all about. if you love someone, sex is just a nice benefit that comes with that. a relationship isn't (at least, it shouldn't be) based on sex. it would probably suck a lot and be an annoyance at first, but i think it'd be worth it to maintain that level of intimacy.
cookiepuss
10-17-2005, 05:38 PM
if it's about getting off, well masterbation is just as satisfying as sex. and I can use my vibrator or shower masager for that and be perfectly happy. Alot of people use sex as the main form of intimacy in thier relationship. So if they aren't able to get intimacy from thier partner without sex they are going to have problems. But I am often just as satisfied with a night of snuggling as I am with a romp in the sack. So I think if we took sex out of the equasion, I could really live without it.
This is an easy question to answer if you are truly in love with someone as you type out your answer, however, if I was not and was hypothetically considering the idea, I would probably answer differently.
Echewta
10-17-2005, 05:51 PM
If my hand was mangled, I'd still use it.
miss_bhaven
10-18-2005, 01:56 AM
If you were in a relationship and your significant other was involved in an accident that disfigured or crippled them, and you had to live without the typical sex life, could you?
If I was in love with them, then yes...I could live with it, as long as I'm with them. Porn viewing may be quite frequent though (y)
zippo
10-18-2005, 11:11 PM
who else thought of that scene in the sixth sense where he visits his wife on the tree cracked in half by the car? i dont think it was sixth sense, but almost sure it was a shyamalan movie
Mcmac
10-18-2005, 11:43 PM
^^ it was "signs" with mel gibson
but your prob thinking of the scary movie 3 take off where he asks if he can still fuck her and shit
zippo
10-18-2005, 11:52 PM
^^ it was "signs" with mel gibson
but your prob thinking of the scary movie 3 take off where he asks if he can still fuck her and shit
word to your mother!
vBulletin® v3.6.7, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.