cingular
01-02-2006, 07:12 AM
LANDMARK FRAUD CASE
PAUL V. HILLARY CLINTON TO BEGIN DISCOVERY.
WE NEED YOUR HELP IMMEDIATELY!
Rather than perpetuating the signature Clinton ethic of denial, semantical and rhetorical responses to valid requests and questions, and stonewalling, it is time to accept your responsibility as a Federal elected official and do the right thing demand made on Sen. Clinton by her Mega-Contributor turned Whistle-Blower Peter Paul.
These suits were credited by the New York Times as causing the indictment of Hilary's former finance chief, David Rosen for fraud. This is a huge victory for Peter Paul.
The Testimony at Mr. Rosens trial validated that the costs associated with the 2000 Hollywood fundraiser were falsified, that Peter Paul personally donated more than $1.2 Million, and that his identity was illegally hidden in Federal Election Commission reports!
THIS SUIT MAY BE THE MEANS THAT FINALLY EXPOSES THE DIRECT EVIDENCE LINKING HILLARY CLINTON TO CRIMINAL AND LEGAL MISCONDUCT. IT MAY ALSO DISCLOSE EVIDENCE OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, FORCING THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TO FINALLY ACT AGAINST HER.
PAUL V. HILLARY CLINTON TO BEGIN DISCOVERY.
WE NEED YOUR HELP IMMEDIATELY!
Rather than perpetuating the signature Clinton ethic of denial, semantical and rhetorical responses to valid requests and questions, and stonewalling, it is time to accept your responsibility as a Federal elected official and do the right thing demand made on Sen. Clinton by her Mega-Contributor turned Whistle-Blower Peter Paul.
These suits were credited by the New York Times as causing the indictment of Hilary's former finance chief, David Rosen for fraud. This is a huge victory for Peter Paul.
The Testimony at Mr. Rosens trial validated that the costs associated with the 2000 Hollywood fundraiser were falsified, that Peter Paul personally donated more than $1.2 Million, and that his identity was illegally hidden in Federal Election Commission reports!
THIS SUIT MAY BE THE MEANS THAT FINALLY EXPOSES THE DIRECT EVIDENCE LINKING HILLARY CLINTON TO CRIMINAL AND LEGAL MISCONDUCT. IT MAY ALSO DISCLOSE EVIDENCE OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, FORCING THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TO FINALLY ACT AGAINST HER.