View Full Version : HAHAHAAH...that poor kid...
Qdrop
01-27-2006, 10:23 AM
http://www.snopes.com/photos/risque/carcouple.asp
hpdrifter
01-27-2006, 10:25 AM
That just makes me sad if its real.
Qdrop
01-27-2006, 10:26 AM
what i don't get is why the kid sees/hears the photographer (leaning forward to see him), but the horny couple doesn't.
could be fake.
that would be easy enough to photoshop, i think
ToucanSpam
01-27-2006, 10:28 AM
I think it's real but there must be some kind of circumstance that explains why she's on top of them.
Most likely that she slipped and fell on his penis.
jabumbo
01-27-2006, 10:28 AM
The photograph is real but depicts something other than what is assumed by viewers (e.g., the woman in the picture was simply captured in the act of trying to reach something stowed in the back seat of the automobile).
what the hell is that supposed to mean?
clearly to reach what was in the back seat she would have to remove the passengers shirt
what the hell is that supposed to mean?
clearly to reach what was in the back seat she would have to remove the passengers shirt
i don't see any shirtless people
maybe the dad had arranged for a hooker for his son to be there too, but she never showed up? and he didn't want to just waste one perfectly good hooker.
Freebasser
01-27-2006, 10:34 AM
A 5 year old could do that in Photoshop.
Maybe it was the kid "in the car" who did it?
maybe the dad had arranged for a hooker for his son to be there too, but she never showed up? and he didn't want to just waste one perfectly good hooker.
you ever tried to get a refund from a hooker?
jabumbo
01-27-2006, 10:35 AM
i don't see any shirtless people
the man being sexed appears to be shirtless
the man being sexed appears to be shirtless
i don't even see a man, not distinctly, anyway. are you sure you're not looking at a leg? i get legs and chests confused sometimes
click on the picture and it gets bigger. i'm pretty sure that's a leg he's seeing as a shirtless man, with no nipples either apparently. and you can also see the real guy's ear and eye kinda!
click on the picture and it gets bigger. i'm pretty sure that's a leg he's seeing as a shirtless man, with no nipples either apparently. and you can also see the real guy's ear and eye kinda!
ah, i didn't know you could click on it. i'm still not convinced though, it's way too indistinct to tell. i mean yeah, it looks like hair and an ear, but maybe i'm just trying to see hair and an ear. maybe it's a purse or something
ericlee
01-27-2006, 10:46 AM
anybody see the pic of the lady laying on the bed spreading her lips apart and there was a baby in the background?
Freebasser
01-27-2006, 10:46 AM
the man being sexed appears to be shirtless
That's a woman's leg, with (presumably) a woman's foot attached.
I'm surprised that you of all people didn't notice.
well whatever you want to believe... i know the truth though. kimberly never showed.
Freebasser
01-27-2006, 10:49 AM
There's also what appears to be an image of a grenade in the back window.
Perhaps the photoshopper's calling card?
hpdrifter
01-27-2006, 10:50 AM
what i don't get is why the kid sees/hears the photographer (leaning forward to see him), but the horny couple doesn't.
could be fake.
That's what I thought. But I bet shit like this does happen.
There's also what appears to be an image of a grenade in the back window.
Perhaps the photoshopper's calling card?
nice eye!
mystery solved (http://www.somethingawful.com/)
i was actually going to suggest that it was an SA photoshop, but i didn't, because i think i give SA too much credit when it comes to funny shit on the internet
Freebasser
01-27-2006, 10:53 AM
*collects roses from his feet and bows before exiting, stage right*
*collects roses from his feet and bows before exiting, stage right*
you should email snopes and show them that, i bet you'd get...thanked, or something
Freebasser
01-27-2006, 10:56 AM
What do I look like, a guy who's not lazy?
ToucanSpam
01-27-2006, 11:00 AM
What do I look like, a guy who's not lazy?
No, you look like one of those 'homosexuals' they keep in the local zoo. :D
Freebasser
01-27-2006, 11:02 AM
Toucanspam, if you were a drink you'd be caffeine-free diet coke.
Qdrop
01-27-2006, 11:03 AM
i think the women IS on top of a dude....but i think the kid was photoshoped in...
the grenade (if it is from "something aweful") does not necessarily mean it's fake...they just put thier icon on some of the pics they post.
who knows...
i think the women IS on top of a dude....but i think the kid was photoshoped in...
the grenade (if it is from "something aweful") does not necessarily mean it's fake...they just put thier icon on some of the pics they post.
who knows...
i don't think that they do, i've been a member of the forums for close to 2 years now, and i've never seen anyone do that. they're kind of anal about image theft over there, they don't generally put their watermark on something unless they created it.
ToucanSpam
01-27-2006, 11:06 AM
Toucanspam, if you were a drink you'd be caffeine-free diet coke.
Lacking content?
Freebasser
01-27-2006, 11:11 AM
Lacking content?
Stop reading into things.
I just meant "weak".
But yeah, lacking content too.
kleptomaniac
01-27-2006, 04:13 PM
the enlarged photo could be used as a wallpaper (lb)
ASsman
01-27-2006, 04:16 PM
Hmm, Good times.
vBulletin® v3.6.7, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.