PDA

View Full Version : Moussaoui: Killer or scapegoat?


Ali
03-07-2006, 04:22 AM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4781106.stm

The prosecution wants to portray Moussaoui as a key figure in the 9/11 attacks, who knowingly sent innocent people to their deaths by failing to tell all he knew to US agents when he was arrested in August 2001.

The defence by contrast is presenting Moussaoui as a fringe figure, inconsequential to the attacks.

As the jurors and Moussaoui listened intently, prosecutor Rob Spencer spoke for 45 minutes outlining the US government case. Mr Spencer vividly recalled 11 September 2001 as a day which dawned clear, crisp and blue.

He described how office workers at the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon sat down at their desks, and passengers on the United and American Airlines flights settled down to their coffee and newspapers as flight attendants made their first rounds.

A day which started with such promise ended so horribly, said Mr Spencer, describing it as a defining moment for a generation. Killers were among us that day, he said dramatically, and one of the conspirators is among us still - at which point he gestured to Moussaoui.

Describing him as a proud and unrepentant terrorist, Mr Spencer said Moussaoui's role in the 9/11 attacks was to lie, to allow his al-Qaeda brothers to go forward with their plot.

This point was made repeatedly - that the US government could have stopped at least some of the 9/11 attacks if Moussaoui had only told the truth when he was arrested in August 2001.

Moussaoui was arrested on immigration charges after the instructor at the flying school he was attending in Minnesota became suspicious of his behaviour - but Moussaoui told federal agents he was a tourist who wanted to learn to fly for personal enjoyment. and for this, he will die.

Qdrop
03-07-2006, 07:25 AM
yes yes....

protect the terrorists. they need protecting.
they are the victims.

beastiefan
03-07-2006, 06:13 PM
I was just talking about this with a guy at work today. I believe Moussaoui is the fall guy. He says he didn't know about the events that would lead up to 9/11. OK, that might be true. It would make perfect sense too...as long as he fulfilled his mission, without knowing the true extent to what would soon come, they can point blame to him...

One man to blame for 9/11, and it's not even Osama! Give me a freakin' break. Now the FBI is saying they found "training documents" that were used by AlQueda members to make up false stories to cover up the truth. Wow!! Seems like the FBI has been doing that for years.

There is so much more to 9/11 than Moussaoui, but since they have him, and we can give him the death penalty Americans can feel better that we have stopped someone responsible for the "War on Terror"

ms.peachy
03-08-2006, 06:39 AM
You'll have to forgive me that I can't seem to find any tears to shed over this guy.

Ali
03-08-2006, 09:17 AM
The court-appointed defence lawyer Edward MacMahon took a very different tack with the jury.

He told them, "This trial is not part of the war on terror - this courtroom is not a battlefield. We must give this man a fair trial, because of who we are and what we stand for ... You can't judge him as a scapegoat for government officials who made errors in the run-up to 9/11."

The second part of the defence strategy is to poke holes in the government theory that Moussaoui's lies after he was arrested caused the deaths on 9/11.

Mr MacMahon put it to the jury that the idea of the government conducting a flawless investigation with no mistakes once Moussaoui confessed all he knew was not consistent with the human experience. Executing this guy will only serve to take the heat off the real culprits, whose incompetence led to the 3,000 deaths on 9/11.

Monsieur Decuts
03-08-2006, 10:28 AM
didn't he already admit he was a "culprit"...are you saying you should only punish those parts of an army that fought in the most deadliest battle of the war.

Ali
03-08-2006, 10:38 AM
didn't he already admit he was a "culprit"...are you saying you should only punish those parts of an army that fought in the most deadliest battle of the war."army"? What army.

Monsieur Decuts
03-08-2006, 11:29 AM
al queda

i didn't think that metaphor was that much of a stretch for someone who posts in this form.

Ali
03-08-2006, 02:31 PM
al queda

i didn't think that metaphor was that much of a stretch for someone who posts in this form.Al queda is an army?

Of which country, please?

Qdrop
03-08-2006, 03:45 PM
shut up, Ali.

fuckin politico geek.

Monsieur Decuts
03-08-2006, 04:31 PM
Al queda is an army?

Of which country, please?

o i don't think they fight under a flag kind sir, that would require a nutsack
such as your passive aggressive discussion questions indicate you may be lacking.

synch
03-08-2006, 05:16 PM
Executing this guy will only serve to take the heat off the real culprits, whose incompetence led to the 3,000 deaths on 9/11.
I agree.

Not that he shouldn't be punished, severely, but people will use him as a scape goat.

"If he had told us what he knew, we could have prevented it. He didn't, so it's his fault that it happened."

Which is a bit twisted.

Ali
03-09-2006, 02:48 PM
o i don't think they fight under a flag kind sir, that would require a nutsack
such as your passive aggressive discussion questions indicate you may be lacking.Ta gueule connard.