PDA

View Full Version : Uh OH....


Qdrop
04-03-2006, 08:48 AM
The religious right moral police just got a foot-hold:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12130036/

Sexy media a trigger for youthful promiscuity
Study: Sexual content in music, movies, TV leads to earlier intercourse

Updated: 7:57 a.m. ET April 3, 2006

CHICAGO - Sexually charged music, magazines, TV and movies push youngsters into intercourse at an earlier age, perhaps by acting as kind of virtual peer that tells them everyone else is doing it, a study said on Monday.

“This is the first time we’ve shown that the more kids are exposed to sex in media the earlier they have sex,” said Jane Brown of the University of North Carolina, chief author of the report.

Previous research had been limited to television, said the study which looked at 1,017 adolescents when they were aged 12 to 14 and again two years later. They were checked on their exposure during the two years to 264 items — movies, TV shows, music and magazines — which were analyzed for their sexual content.

In general it found that the highest exposure levels led to more sexual activity, with white teens in the group 2.2 times more likely to have had intercourse at ages 14 to 16 than similar youngsters who had the least exposure.

The effect was not as pronounced for blacks, the study said, perhaps because the black youngsters in the study were already more sexually experienced than the whites were when the research began and thus were less influenced by media exposure over the two-year period.

The teenage pregnancy rate in the United States is three to 10 times higher than that found in other industrialized nations, making that and exposure to sexually transmitted infections a major public health concern, the study said.

Everybody's doing it
At the same time parents tend not to talk about sex with their children in a timely and comprehensive way, leaving a vacuum in which the media may become a powerful sex educator, providing “frequent and compelling portraits of sex as fun and risk free.”

“Interestingly one of the strongest predictors of risk for early sexual intercourse for both black and white teens (in the study) was the perception that his or her peers were having sex,” the report said.

Youngsters “may begin to believe the world view portrayed and may begin to adopt the media’s social norms as their own. Some, especially those who have fewer alternative sources of sexual norms, such as parents or friends, may use the media as a kind of sexual superpeer that encourages them to be sexually active,” the report added.

The study was published in the April issue of “Pediatrics,” the journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A portion of the data was previously published in the Journal of Adolescent Health.

The study was done in several schools in North Carolina. The authors said that they did not measure the impact of exposure to sexual material on the Internet because when the research began in 2001 relatively few of the early adolescents in the sample had Internet access.

Additional research should include exposure to Web-based material, the study suggested.

“It took many studies over a number of years to establish that violence in the media increased children’s violent behavior and to begin initiatives to reduce harmful effects,” the study said.

“Given the consistent findings regarding media violence, it may be prudent not to wait decades to conclude that the media are also important sources of sexual norms for youth,” it added.

-----------

most interesting part, to me: "At the same time parents tend not to talk about sex with their children in a timely and comprehensive way, leaving a vacuum in which the media may become a powerful sex educator, providing “frequent and compelling portraits of sex as fun and risk free."

but i'm sure the moral police will gloss over that part, and say the answer is censorship, not more parental guidance.

Funkaloyd
04-03-2006, 09:27 PM
God dammit, when the pro-censorship, media effects model fuckers do shit like this I just want to go and punch one of them in the face. But I don't, 'cause they'd just say, "that's a classic example of the effects of violent movies and video games on a malleable young mind".

Most of the studies they're reporting on here didn't even use control groups. Maybe they've got it totally wrong, and it's the case that those individuals who are more likely to be sexually successful at a younger age (because of higher self-esteem or some other variable) are also more likely to take an interest in shitty t&a movies and MTV booty shaking? Then again, maybe the researches are right, and there is a causal relationship. Either way, we don't know until the studies are done properly, and going to Reuters and letting them publish a totally inaccurate article on the studies is, imo, unethical.

"Won't somebody please think of the children?!! (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v621/Geffrod/helen.jpg)"

Ace42X
04-03-2006, 09:30 PM
http://www.beastieboys.com/bbs/showthread.php?t=65146

Should get admin to merge threads.

http://www.beastieboys.com/bbs/showthread.php?t=65101

THINK OF THE CHILDREN!

Schmeltz
04-03-2006, 09:42 PM
Not only is mass media culture hyper-sexualized, and not only are children apparently not receiving decent sexual education from their parents, but the hormones and shit in our diets are prompting physical changes in people at younger and younger ages. Trend kind of reminds me of the sexually mature four and five-year-olds in Brave New World. Creepy.

DroppinScience
04-03-2006, 11:24 PM
Ummm... don't most kids just wish they were having sex as opposed to engaging in it? ;)

Qdrop
04-04-2006, 07:42 AM
http://www.beastieboys.com/bbs/showthread.php?t=65146

Should get admin to merge threads.

http://www.beastieboys.com/bbs/showthread.php?t=65101

THINK OF THE CHILDREN!

yeah, i do that because entirely differant members are on each section...and many never venture into the other section.
i like to get varying viewpoints.

Funkaloyd
04-04-2006, 08:56 PM
Faithbanks totally plagiarized me!

Ace42X
04-04-2006, 09:32 PM
yeah, i do that because entirely differant members are on each section...and many never venture into the other section.
i like to get varying viewpoints.

Get the admins to merge and move the threads, and there'll still be a place marker left in the other one.