PDA

View Full Version : Q- your popular mechanics article on debunking 9-11 has officially been debunked

drizl
08-12-2006, 01:25 AM
it was authored by ben chertoff, cousin of homeland security chief michael chertoff.

"Ben Chertoff, the chief editor of the piece, being cousins with Michael Chertoff, the new Secretery of Homeland Security, an agency which owes its very existence to the establishment version of the 9/11 attack."




http://www.prisonplanet.tv/audio/090305alexresponds.htm
EN[i]GMA
08-12-2006, 06:33 AM
A poison the well fallacy is not a 'debunking' of anything.

It's as logical as saying "Yeah, well Hitler believed 2 and 2 make 4, so it has to be wrong."
Qdrop
08-12-2006, 06:48 AM
ignore Drizl...

giving people like him a stage only emboldens them...
drizl
08-12-2006, 07:40 AM
embolden me:eek: !

fucking sick that this guy was appointed to popular mechanics, a magazine started by william randolph hearst, the man who invented the term corporate media, specifically to write this peice (of shit) which so many uninformed americans look at and say:
"well, thats it! looks like this one is deeeeeeeebunked!"

trust nothing that comes from the government.
QueenAdrock
08-12-2006, 03:10 PM
I'm sick of the 9/11 myth things about the explosives being in the buildings. My dad was an expert witness in the field of explosives for 30+ years, and HE told me no and explained why. And mind you, he hates Bush more than I do and would have loved to jump on the conspiracy theory bandwagon and take him down.
yeahwho
08-12-2006, 03:20 PM
Popular Mechanics is behind the World Trade Center bombing?

Anything to sell advertising.
TimDoolan
08-12-2006, 03:31 PM
There is no 9/11 conspiracy you morons.

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons
D_Raay
08-13-2006, 04:24 AM
There is no 9/11 conspiracy you morons.

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons
That is a pretty poor attempt at explaining it away.
The government wouldn't have to "kill" mr Avery just label him a conspiracy nut or ignore him altogether and let someone else label him for them.
QueenAdrock
08-13-2006, 10:22 AM
There is no 9/11 conspiracy you morons.

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons

Yeah, I was reading his page and I love Maddox to death, but his reasoning was flawed. Don't you think that the government WOULDN'T kill him, just to make people like Maddox think that way? It'd be pretty obvious that there WAS a cover-up if he was killed. The government's not stupid. "Hey, so-and-so who was talking shit about the government is dead. Government conspiracy!" "Hey, so-and-so who was talking shit about the government ISN'T dead! No government conspiracy!" That's silly.
yeahwho
08-13-2006, 12:34 PM
What i like about conspiracism is it does keep people on their toes. It would be equally as silly to think nobody would question the series of events since George W. Bush ran and became appointed President of the US.

I think everyone over the age of 18 has been part of a series of events that required you to keep your trap shut about what your involved in.

I kind of doubt the World Trade Center had any insider involvement, but I'm sure glad people are willing to excercise their freedom to question it.

On another topic, the math is correct, something is very off bubble about GWB.
drizl
08-13-2006, 04:53 PM
I'm sick of the 9/11 myth things about the explosives being in the buildings. My dad was an expert witness in the field of explosives for 30+ years, and HE told me no and explained why. And mind you, he hates Bush more than I do and would have loved to jump on the conspiracy theory bandwagon and take him down.



im interested to know the proof of it not being demolished....

especially when there is so much proof suggesting it was.