DroppinScience
08-17-2006, 12:29 PM
CNN terrorism expert Peter Bergen says no.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/08/15/bergen.answers/index.html
The quote...
Q: If it's true that bin Laden once worked for the CIA, what makes you so sure that he isn't still?
Anne Busigin, Toronto, Canada
BERGEN: This is one of those things where you cannot put it out of its misery.
The story about bin Laden and the CIA -- that the CIA funded bin Laden or trained bin Laden -- is simply a folk myth. There's no evidence of this. In fact, there are very few things that bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahiri and the U.S. government agree on. They all agree that they didn't have a relationship in the 1980s. And they wouldn't have needed to. Bin Laden had his own money, he was anti-American and he was operating secretly and independently.
The real story here is the CIA didn't really have a clue about who this guy was until 1996 when they set up a unit to really start tracking him.
I dunno, man. Wasn't bin Laden a mujahadin (sp?) in the '80s to fight the Soviets? And these guys were trained and funded by the U.S. Maybe the reality of what Mr. Bergen is trying to convey is that they trained these guys to fight the Soviets (and bin Laden just happened to be one of many fighters), so any CIA connections are merely indirect?
Can someone help clarify, please. :confused:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/08/15/bergen.answers/index.html
The quote...
Q: If it's true that bin Laden once worked for the CIA, what makes you so sure that he isn't still?
Anne Busigin, Toronto, Canada
BERGEN: This is one of those things where you cannot put it out of its misery.
The story about bin Laden and the CIA -- that the CIA funded bin Laden or trained bin Laden -- is simply a folk myth. There's no evidence of this. In fact, there are very few things that bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahiri and the U.S. government agree on. They all agree that they didn't have a relationship in the 1980s. And they wouldn't have needed to. Bin Laden had his own money, he was anti-American and he was operating secretly and independently.
The real story here is the CIA didn't really have a clue about who this guy was until 1996 when they set up a unit to really start tracking him.
I dunno, man. Wasn't bin Laden a mujahadin (sp?) in the '80s to fight the Soviets? And these guys were trained and funded by the U.S. Maybe the reality of what Mr. Bergen is trying to convey is that they trained these guys to fight the Soviets (and bin Laden just happened to be one of many fighters), so any CIA connections are merely indirect?
Can someone help clarify, please. :confused: