PDA

View Full Version : Senior Democrat renews call for military draft


ET
11-19-2006, 06:27 PM
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061119/pl_nm/usa_politics_draft_dc

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - An influential Democratic lawmaker on Sunday called for reinstatement of the draft as a way to boost U.S. troop levels and draw a broader section of the population into the military or public service.

U.S. Rep. Charles Rangel (news, bio, voting record), the incoming chairman of the House of Representatives' tax-writing committee, said he would introduce legislation to reinstate the draft as soon as the new, Democratic-controlled Congress convenes in January.

Asked on CBS' "Face the Nation" if he was still serious about the proposal for a universal draft he raised a couple of years ago, he said, "You bet your life. Underscore serious."

"If we're going to challenge
Iran and challenge
North Korea and then, as some people have asked, to send more troops to
Iraq, we can't do that without a draft," he said.

Rangel, who opposed the 2003 invasion of Iraq, also said he did not think the United States would have invaded Iraq if the children of members of Congress were sent to fight. He has said the U.S. fighting force is comprised disproportionately of people from low-income families and minorities.

"I don't see how anyone can support the war and not support the draft. I think to do so is hypocritical," he said.

The New York Democrat had introduced legislation to reinstate the draft in January 2003 before the Iraq invasion. The
Pentagon has said the all-volunteer army is working well and there is no need for a draft, and the idea had no traction in the Republican-led Congress.

Democrats gained control of both the House and Senate for the first time in 12 years in the November 7 election, and a wholesale change in the leadership of Congress is to be made in January. Rangel is to head the House Ways and Means Committee, which is charged with U.S. tax and trade legislation.

The draft was in place from 1948 to 1973, when the United States converted to an all-volunteer army. But almost all men living in the United States - including most male noncitizens - are required to register with the Selective Service upon reaching 18, and federal benefits, including financial aid for college studies, are contingent on registration.

Rangel said his legislation on the draft would also offer the alternative of a couple of years of public service with educational benefits.


TIAJUANA MEXICO PLZ

DroppinScience
11-19-2006, 06:32 PM
Would it actually go anywhere this time?

Documad
11-19-2006, 06:38 PM
Not a chance.

Documad
11-19-2006, 06:42 PM
I don't know why they call him influential. He's been there a long time, so he is a ranking member, but I don't think that he has a history of getting others to follow him. He's in a super safe seat, and part of the fun of that is doing based upon principle even when you know they're not going anywhere.

Personally, I think there should have been a draft in 2003. If people really wanted to invade Iraq, there should have been a price.

The Notorious LOL
11-19-2006, 07:41 PM
assuming they ever managed to re-enlist the draft, I have 8 years worth of people ahead of me which bides me time to run to canada.

QueenAdrock
11-19-2006, 07:49 PM
But you hate Canada, Nick.

Seeing as how majority of Democrats don't agree with what he's saying, good fuckin' luck to him.

The Notorious LOL
11-19-2006, 08:15 PM
I hate the US as well. Canada just sucks worse.

QueenAdrock
11-19-2006, 09:35 PM
Let's all move to Scandinavia, then!

mikizee
11-20-2006, 05:04 AM
Nah, move to Australia!

Its kinda like the US, but with much better looking (and not fat) people.

less stupid people too. (y)

Except for the fact that our PM loves Bush so much.

King PSYZ
11-20-2006, 12:12 PM
oh so I guess I wouldn't be welcome in your lovely country fuckbag.

Ali
11-21-2006, 09:17 AM
Bet you none of the children of any senator or congressman gets drafted. Not to anywhere dangerous, anyway.

QueenAdrock
11-21-2006, 12:25 PM
^That's his whole point he's making, though. He says since Congressmen don't have to send their kids now, maybe they'd rethink their policies if their kids WERE forced into the military.

So if there were a draft to be instated (which won't happen) and the Congressmen's children dodged it, the whole thing would be a failure.

sam i am
11-22-2006, 12:11 PM
PLUS....

He's on the freaking Ways & Means Committee, NOT an military affairs committees.

Talk about pissing in the wind.



As for Ali's assertion on the lack of Congresspeoples' children being drafted : depends on how the draft was reinstated....with or without exemptions....age limitations....physical attributes....whether it would be for both men and women...etc.

The actual implementation would be fairly easy, as all men (I don't know if women have to do this as well) over 18 have to register for the Selective Service....just for such an eventuality of a draft ever being reinstated.

Funkaloyd
11-23-2006, 10:20 AM
less stupid people too. (y)
Hah. No.