PDA

View Full Version : No more Global War on Terror


QueenAdrock
04-05-2007, 08:43 AM
http://www.militarytimes.com/news/2007/04/military_gwot_democrats_070403w/

Gotta say, I agree. It's crap that they use the term "Global War on Terror" for the war in Iraq, since in the beginning of the war there was no terrorism there. They just like to say "Terror" so people think it's a worthwhile cause, going after and catching the people who caused 9/11 and those who could strike again. That was never the point of Iraq. But due to their clever semantics, they could say "Hey, global war on terror! Sure, we could try for Bin Laden, but we can also go after Hussein! Saddam terrorized his people, so therefore technically he's a "terrorist" and a threat to the US! Let's invade!"

(n)

kaiser soze
04-05-2007, 12:07 PM
It should be called the Global War OF Terror

CIA Jundullah (who have ties to Al Qaeda) raids in Iran (http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2007%5C04%5C05%5Cstory_5-4-2007_pg1_1)

http://www.newsline.com.pk/NewsAug2004/cover1Aug2004.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jundallah

So the CIA is supporting a group of "revolutionaries" suspected of having ties to Al Qaeda, how grand is that and what the fuck does THIS really mean to the citizens of the nations attacked by Al Qaeda (if it was just Al Qaeda)?

They are only "terrorists" if they attack us, are allies, or our interests

bush - "You are either with us or against us."

bush - "We will not make any distinction between the terrorists and the nations that harbor them."

Ali
04-10-2007, 10:49 AM
It should be called the Global War OF Terror

CIA Jundullah (who have ties to Al Qaeda) raids in Iran (http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2007%5C04%5C05%5Cstory_5-4-2007_pg1_1)

http://www.newsline.com.pk/NewsAug2004/cover1Aug2004.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jundallah

So the CIA is supporting a group of "revolutionaries" suspected of having ties to Al Qaeda, how grand is that and what the fuck does THIS really mean to the citizens of the nations attacked by Al Qaeda (if it was just Al Qaeda)?

They are only "terrorists" if they attack us, are allies, or our interests

bush - "You are either with us or against us."

bush - "We will not make any distinction between the terrorists and the nations that harbor them."

CIA supported Saddam and Bin Laden in the past... still do!

yeahwho
04-10-2007, 02:12 PM
When I first read the topic header I thought for sure it said "No more Global Warming on Terror" and then I thought WTF has it all`come `down to now?