QueenAdrock
07-30-2008, 04:31 PM
It's a topic that I have very strong opinions about, being a librarian (or half-librarian, I'm not quite done my degree yet). Some people say that Internet filters are mandatory for 'protecting children,' but oftentimes they're abused, don't work properly, etc. Someone trying to run a search for 'breast cancer' in a public library with filters will not be able to find the information; the word 'breast' is considered offensive and is automatically blocked, regardless of the context (forget about that chicken recipe you wanted to find, too!). I believe in intellectual freedom wholeheartedly, and believe the public should have free and open access to information.
I'm against all forms of Internet filters, regardless of context. But seeing them on a national, oppressive scale just breaks my heart. No government should have a say in what its citizens are allowed to read. China believes it has the authority to do so, however:
http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/07/30/olympics.internet.ap/index.html
I can't imagine living in such an oppressive society that they would filter the Internet for its citizens. This isn't the first time China's done it, and it certainly won't be the last. (n)
I'm against all forms of Internet filters, regardless of context. But seeing them on a national, oppressive scale just breaks my heart. No government should have a say in what its citizens are allowed to read. China believes it has the authority to do so, however:
http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/07/30/olympics.internet.ap/index.html
I can't imagine living in such an oppressive society that they would filter the Internet for its citizens. This isn't the first time China's done it, and it certainly won't be the last. (n)