Pro-life, pro-execution?

[rirv]

What are the views of the Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates regarding execution?

Can you be anti-abortion and pro-execution?

Why do I get the feeling that McCain/Palin are the above.

I've tried searching for some articles on this matter but all I get is columns of ridiculous partisan bullshit, pictures of abortions and racist crap about executing black men.

[Dorothy Wood]

trying googling "capital punishment", that's what they call it here. or "death penalty".

McCain is for it. dunno about Palin, but usually people who are pro-life like to have the babies grow up and become criminals before they murder them.

[fucktopgirl]

^haha , good analyze !!

[100% ILL]

Here is a list of offenders executed here in North Carolina


http://www.doc.state.nc.us/DOP/deathpenalty/index.htm

This is a list of women offenders currently on Death Row in N.C.

http://www.doc.state.nc.us/DOP/deathpenalty/women.htm

This is a brief history of the Death Penalty in North Carolina

http://www.doc.state.nc.us/DOP/deathpenalty/DPhistory.htm

[checkyourprez]

i do find that view pretty hypocritical. im guessing mccain and palin both think that way.


however, the same argument could also be brought up from the opposite side, which i am most definitely not a part of, just playing some devils advocate.

how can you be pro-abortion, and kill poor defenseless babies. yet be anti-execution and want to save the lives of scum bag murders and so on.

the difference i guess, to me anyways, lies in the initial definition of when a fetus turns into a person. and or the woman's right to choose trumps all else in that situation.

[King PSYZ]

see rirv, I've been telling you and all the other non-Americans we DO know what irony is. otherwise how could we come up with such an insane dichotomey?

[Bob]

^haha , good analyze !!

for once i agree with you

[yeahwho]

Senator Clinton along with Cecile Richards, the president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, wrote this Op/Ed piece for the NYTimes on Sept. 18, 2008.

Blocking Care for Women (http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/19/opinion/19clinton.html?em)

LAST month, the Bush administration launched the latest salvo in its eight-year campaign to undermine women’s rights and women’s health by placing ideology ahead of science: a proposed rule from the Department of Health and Human Services that would govern family planning. It would require that any health care entity that receives federal financing — whether it’s a physician in private practice, a hospital or a state government — certify in writing that none of its employees are required to assist in any way with medical services they find objectionable.

Laws that have been on the books for some 30 years already allow doctors to refuse to perform abortions. The new rule would go further, ensuring that all employees and volunteers for health care entities can refuse to aid in providing any treatment they object to, which could include not only abortion and sterilization but also contraception.

Along with the accumulative effect of having a major crisis weekly, the Bush administration also enjoys taking away freedoms and putting a price tag on your new restrictions. Now the whole fucking economy is looking for some pretend money to bail it out.

Republicans, they hate us for our freedoms.

[King PSYZ]

this means that a hospital could refuse to deliver an out of wedlock baby, do an aids test, provide medical care to a homosexual, illegal immigrant, black, asian, hispanic, middle eastern, white, etc...

can of worms, your opener and your day has arrived.

[Randetica]

death penalty is so 100 years ago