Adam
11-11-2008, 04:52 AM
I'm not sure where I stand on this issue and the reason for the thread is that I've been reading/hearing a lot about it recently. Partly because Sheffield where I live has a bit of a history in the sex trade which has had some pretty brutal stories where women are forced to have sex after false promises of a better life from places in eastern europe and asia.
On the one hand, if it was fully legal, fully licensed and a place where you can go to for sex without having to be underhand it would put these sex workers to earning more money rather than the pimps, they'd pay tax and should be more protected and secure than having to go underground - I don't think for one minute that every1s story is the same that leads 'em to this line of work.
On the other hand, if it was fully illegal (its kinda legal already in the UK), then the pimps can be handed sentences and rehabilitation of sex workers can be made. Making the workers criminals would deter workers from starting but would also make criminals of people who had no choice in the matter.
I've never paid for sex and doubt I ever will. Being male, I've thought about what it would be like but I wouldn't know what underhand seedy club or sauna I would need to visit to get it. But if it was in the yellow pages or advertised well, which it was clean, would it make more inclined to go? Probably. I'd probably be more likely to go also if I knew it was clean, well protected and made to sign a disclaimer on my actions there. If there was rules in place of how many clients you can see per day etc with a minimum amount of daily pay for workers would I think please both sets of parties but also it would encourage it. But then there is the issue, its pretty bold move by any government to go down. And I know women enjoy sex to so they'd also be a call for male prostitution. Which I know there is already but y'know, I think it'd be more of a male thing.
So what do you think?
On the one hand, if it was fully legal, fully licensed and a place where you can go to for sex without having to be underhand it would put these sex workers to earning more money rather than the pimps, they'd pay tax and should be more protected and secure than having to go underground - I don't think for one minute that every1s story is the same that leads 'em to this line of work.
On the other hand, if it was fully illegal (its kinda legal already in the UK), then the pimps can be handed sentences and rehabilitation of sex workers can be made. Making the workers criminals would deter workers from starting but would also make criminals of people who had no choice in the matter.
I've never paid for sex and doubt I ever will. Being male, I've thought about what it would be like but I wouldn't know what underhand seedy club or sauna I would need to visit to get it. But if it was in the yellow pages or advertised well, which it was clean, would it make more inclined to go? Probably. I'd probably be more likely to go also if I knew it was clean, well protected and made to sign a disclaimer on my actions there. If there was rules in place of how many clients you can see per day etc with a minimum amount of daily pay for workers would I think please both sets of parties but also it would encourage it. But then there is the issue, its pretty bold move by any government to go down. And I know women enjoy sex to so they'd also be a call for male prostitution. Which I know there is already but y'know, I think it'd be more of a male thing.
So what do you think?