GIants humans??

[fucktopgirl]

Is it possible? Yes-No?

I am puzzle by it, quite a mystery.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-8bVEIVUh8&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qMp9O2ey4fQ&feature=related

It could explain monumental rock construction!!

[taquitos]

no. but i like the thread. (y)

[b i o n i c]

maybe. i believe in human giants (http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/1077/human-giant-job-interview-from-human-giant)

[fucktopgirl]

no. but i like the thread. (y)

And why not, the proof(pictures) seem genuine, not ALL of them, but some really do seem authentics.

I cannot say that i believe in it but i cannot say that i dont. If those picture are real well, that would change lots of things in our human history.

But i love mystery , it put a little spice on top of our monotonous life.

[paul jones]

their laptops must have been the size of a tennis court!:eek:

[paul jones]

hey I was just on mygay and saw this!

http://www.myspace.com/aplaceforvideo


I'm not sure that will work,I dunno.Anyway it was/is a clip of and 8 foot something Ukranian bloke

[faz]

Didn't get off to a good start (http://www.snopes.com/photos/odd/giantman.asp)

[Pres Zount]

Does anyone else imagine that fuktopgirl sounds like Skwisgaar Skwigelf?

[fucktopgirl]

Didn't get off to a good start (http://www.snopes.com/photos/odd/giantman.asp)

Maybe this one is faked but not all the other, anyway i am not convinced that it is not true just base on this particular picture.

^oh and Zount, i am a girl so , i dont sound like a dude. You should quite drugs.

[Bob]

i am not convinced that it is not true just base on this particular picture.


you are skeptical of the most random things...

[fucktopgirl]

hey I was just on mygay and saw this!

http://www.myspace.com/aplaceforvideo


I'm not sure that will work,I dunno.Anyway it was/is a clip of and 8 foot something Ukranian bloke

Yes, i saw a show on him not long ago, some doctor wanted him to have an operation because his gigantism was related to the pituary gland extraproduction, so the removing of it would stop the growth of this gland and give him back his life. But it happen that he was ok and his gland stop producing the hormone.

Quite a man anyway, sex with him would be impossible!!

Maybe he is a remnant of the giants that once lives upon us:D

[fucktopgirl]

you are skeptical of the most random things...

:p

But i study archeology/anthropology and weird discoveries are pretty nice and fun to inquired. A race of giants have been describe in ancients civilization, gilgamesh book(ancient sumerian), bible, and so on. So, was it base on some truth?
Fossile evidence seem pretty strong as a proof of such a race. Maybe not!

[checkyourprez]

most of all that looks real fake.


if this stuff was true it would be all over the news.



but i do remember from an anthro class i took in college there was a branch of the human evolutionary family that was noticeably larger. but more along the lines of shaq o'neal sized people and not 15 foot giants or anything.

they have shown how they built the pyramids already, same thing with the easter island statues. just a lot of man power and some ingenuity.

[fucktopgirl]

most of all that looks real fake.
I dont agree here


if this stuff was true it would be all over the news.

And no, i really doubt that it would be all over the news for a simple reason, human evolution like they tell us, i.e. Darwin and the origin of species, would all be shattered.



they have shown how they built the pyramids already, same thing with the easter island statues. just a lot of man power and some ingenuity.

Heh, maybe ...

[b i o n i c]

it has been in the news, jerkies

[checkyourprez]

It has been in the news! (http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/12/071214-giant-skeleton.html)

[YoungRemy]

lol, we're just now getting around to nephilim and anunnaki here?

[fucktopgirl]

what about the others pictures twitos?

[YoungRemy]

what about the others pictures twitos?

go prove they are true with some more youtube videos.

don't put the burden of proof on us, you're the anthropology student!

[HAL 9000]

And no, i really doubt that it would be all over the news for a simple reason, human evolution like they tell us, i.e. Darwin and the origin of species, would all be shattered.


Who is "they" in this case?

I would like to know more of this mysterious organisation that would be capable of suppressing the most important scientific discovery in human history. What is their motivation for doing it? How do they get the hundreds of thousands of biologists working in universities all over the world to keep quiet about the big secret? Why would ‘they’ care whether or not people believe in Natural Selection? Why are ‘they’ not able to have videos taken down from youtube (something that is very easy to do) despite their iron fisted control over the rest of the world’s media?


I note that if one googles “Giant Humans” most of the hits are creationist fundie websites showing how these images support the old testament view of history. Oh and David Icke’s website seems to come up quite a lot too.

I personally find it easier to believe that these obviously photoshopped and/or out of context images are indeed photoshopped and/or out of context images rather than that they are the missing piece of evidence in a massive conspiracy theory to hide humanity’s true history from the public.

As you pointed out, there are people who have a condition called Gigantism, but there is no evidence of a Giant race of humans or of another hominid species which was similarly massive.

I would be interested to know which pictures you didn’t think looked fake as they all did to me. I especially liked the second video as it included a picture of a red plastic dinosaur toy about 1:40 in. They also have pictures of “conehead skulls”. These are often cited as evidence for aliens or whatever crackpot idea the user wants. They mostly come from ancient Peru and seem to be the result of a rather horrific process called ‘Skull binding’ which was practiced on children.

[fucktopgirl]

^ Like i state earlier in this post, i am not convinced that those giants skeletons are genuine as i never saw one with my own eyes but i am not convinced that they are all faked.

The main stream theory , natural selection/evolution, is the base of all our science, all of them. If something would come up and disturbed this theory, yes let's not forget that it is still a theory, well all the system of belief could fall down, not something very attracting...

Also, it is either evolution or creationist, no middle ground here. I think human history and the history of civilization that populated our planet is far more complex then what we know today. I could also be wrong.

As an example, they say the civilization go back to the sumerians, something like 4000bc. Ok fine, what about underwater structure that have been found, like Yoganuni. This one could date back to 10000bc. Nobody talk about this discovery although it is major. Huge underwater structure that could be the oldest one know to men. Nope, not a word on it. But this is another subject.

To come back to the giants, i personnaly like the idea and mystery of it , it could be true and , yes, a missing piece of human history on this planet. BUt i dont know, it could also be just an hoax.

Conehead skulls have been found throughout america; pacific north west coast, meso-america and south america. It is something very widespread and yes, it is related to skulls binding. Although, some tales in different culture related them to a race that descend from god. Different shapes of skulls binding can be seen, in Machu Picchu, they were differents forms of bindings coming from differents regions of the Incas empire.

Anyway, it is food for thoughts!

[HAL 9000]

The main stream theory , natural selection/evolution, is the base of all our science, all of them. If something would come up and disturbed this theory, yes let's not forget that it is still a theory, well all the system of belief could fall down, not something very attracting...



Don’t forget that this only increases the motivation to tear down the theory. The greatest scientific heroes are those who showed that the prevailing theories were wrong.


Just one point to make – your comment that Evolution is ‘Only a theory’ is something I hear a lot and seems to reflect a misunderstanding of what theories and facts are.

A theory is a structure that explains a set of facts. Thus the theory of evolution – also known as Natural Selection is the concept that explains the ‘Fact(s) of Evolution’. The fact of evolution refers to the numerous observations that confirm that all life is subject to common descent ie descended from a single ancestor and that species have evolved over time to suit their environment. Natural Selection (The theory of Evolution) explains why and how this happens.

Before the current Theory of Evolution (which is basically very similar to that proposed by Darwin) we had a different theory of evolution called Lamarkian Evolution but it was wrong. The facts were the same – it was an attempt to explain why we all come from a single ancestor and evolve to suit our environment, but it was a different mechanism (people inherited learned or developed attributes rather than nature selecting the fittest organism as with Darwin’s Theory. Testing ultimately showed Darwin to be right and Lamark wrong (although some studies show a variation of Lamarkian evolution can occur sometimes).

A hypothesis graduates to a theory when it has been subject to rigorous testing. Darwin’s theory is one of the most tested theories in science. That it still stands is a measure of its strength. To refer to it as ‘only a theory’ does not give it credit for being one of the most repeatedly verified concepts in science. A much stronger theory than Gravity or the Germ Theory of Disease which are generally accepted by the public.

People say ‘only a theory’ to imply it is something about which we are unsure but this is a misunderstanding. Other major scientific theories include the Theory of Gravity which tries to explain the Fact of Gravity (ie the observation that matter attracts other matter at a distance and things fall down).

So Gravity is only a theory, and science is often changing it in an attempt to explain the origin of matter (this is a key focus of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN). However, to say Gravity is only a theory does not imply that Gravity is not a real force in the universe that we feel all the time. Similarly to say Evolution is only a theory does nothing to negate the millions of observation that comprise the fact of evolution and common descent.

I hope that makes sense – ‘theory’ is probably one of the most misunderstood words in science and it is important to get it right if one is to understand the strength of the scientific method.

[ericlee]

Does anyone else imagine that fuktopgirl sounds like Skwisgaar Skwigelf?


lol

[Dorothy Wood]

I don't really see how if giants existed, it would destroy the theory of evolution. I mean, maybe they existed, but weren't superior or efficient enough to survive...so they didn't. that's natural selection, right?

There's a lot we know, but a whole shit ton that we don't...so I'm not going to deny the possible existence of giants. although, those pictures were all very fake-looking and far from proof.

I went to a scientific cavern in arizona a few months ago where they're discovering crazy old stuff all the time. they found the bones of a giant sloth down there and keep finding new bugs and whatnot. it's pretty amazing. my mom and I swear we got an ancient cave disease down there. :eek:

anyway, clearly there are regular-sized sloths that still exist today. but there were giant ones before, they just died out.

[fucktopgirl]

^It would destroy the hominids evolution which is base on Darwin evolution theory. Where would you put to giants dudes?

Between neaderthal and erectus?


The megafauna did extinct like at the end of the pleistocen period. They surely did exit. maybe giant where living in those time.:D

[funk63]

The devil planted those here to trick us into believing in evolution.

[checkyourprez]

^It would destroy the hominids evolution which is base on Darwin evolution theory. Where would you put to giants dudes?

Between neaderthal and erectus?


The megafauna did extinct like at the end of the pleistocen period. They surely did exit. maybe giant where living in those time.:D

or, natural selection lead to people becoming giant to defend from predators, to get food, ect. would be the explanation through natural selection.

there are tons of examples of the same animal (well eventually different) really big in one place, and really small in another as naturally selected to fit their situation.

so in my humble, non archeologist opinion, it would not destroy the Darwin's theory, just add another link.

[fucktopgirl]

or, natural selection lead to people becoming giant to defend from predators, to get food, ect. would be the explanation through natural selection.

there are tons of examples of the same animal (well eventually different) really big in one place, and really small in another as naturally selected to fit their situation.

so in my humble, non archeologist opinion, it would not destroy the Darwin's theory, just add another link.

Maybe, but my feeling is that, if those were alive at one time, it would not fit in this multiregional model of evolution or the single africain roots that spread out.

But it might be just an hoax, it is too much surreal.