Teabaggers to hold 2nd Amendment March in DC on April 19th - complete with guns

[kaiser soze]

Ah yes, guns are now the defacto political opposition motivator. Now where were these "Defendors (http://www.imdb.com/video/imdb/vi973406745/) of Liberty and Freedom when our rights were rightly flushed down the toilet with the Patriot Act and other Homeland Security Provisions?

Now yes the 2nd Amendment is a great Amendment, but taking it to this level is straight up menacing.

Now what else has happened on April 19th in American History?

http://www.secondamendmentmarch.com/march_news

[yeahwho]

People sure bitch a lot on the internet, then they watch bitchfest 24 hour news channels, then they gather together and bitch out in the sunlight and look really white. A lot of them are really out of shape too.

Not a response to anything politically, just an observation of how a lot of these folks look when they come out and walk around. They look like they need doctors, pills and deodorant products.

[RobMoney$]

Why are Democrats shocked by threats of violence?
You are acting as if this just something the extreme right is capable of?
I mean, you sound like you don't believe the American people should be able to protest publicly?

Violence against politicians exists throughout the world.
I'm not advocating this type of behavior, but why are you so shocked?
The GOP already denounced it, but then the Dems are looking for the GOP to stand out in front of this?
Clearly a smear tactic. Nothing unusual there, I guess.

And the GOP is not without some good chuckles too.
Refusing to work past 2pm (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/24/gop-senators-refusing-to_n_511639.html) and commenting that they won't cooperate (http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/89023-mccain-blame-democrats-for-lack-of-senate-cooperation) on any bill for the rest of this Congress' term is a joke.
The more I watch this, the more I realize how foolish we are as Americans for putting up with all this by continuing to vote for these idiots.

I'm not condoning violence, but perhaps these politicians need to be shaken up a bit.
They live in a bubble world where the checks keep rolling in no matter what, while the rest of us struggle day in and day out to make ends meet.
So what if a politician is worried for his or her life.

I mean assassinations are pretty rare.
When was the last time anyone in politics was killed by a citizen?
That's why the threats are so off the ranch to most of them, because in their world nothing goes wrong.
Maybe some good can come out of it for us all.

[Sir SkratchaLot]

I haven't seen that many white people in DC since Rosevelt was in office.

[kaiser soze]

Why are Democrats shocked by threats of violence?
You are acting as if this just something the extreme right is capable of?
I mean, you sound like you don't believe the American people should be able to protest publicly?

Violence against politicians exists throughout the world.
I'm not advocating this type of behavior, but why are you so shocked?
The GOP already denounced it, but then the Dems are looking for the GOP to stand out in front of this?
Clearly a smear tactic. Nothing unusual there, I guess.

And the GOP is not without some good chuckles too.
Refusing to work past 2pm (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/24/gop-senators-refusing-to_n_511639.html) and commenting that they won't cooperate (http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/89023-mccain-blame-democrats-for-lack-of-senate-cooperation) on any bill for the rest of this Congress' term is a joke.
The more I watch this, the more I realize how foolish we are as Americans for putting up with all this by continuing to vote for these idiots.

I'm not condoning violence, but perhaps these politicians need to be shaken up a bit.
They live in a bubble world where the checks keep rolling in no matter what, while the rest of us struggle day in and day out to make ends meet.
So what if a politician is worried for his or her life.

I mean assassinations are pretty rare.
When was the last time anyone in politics was killed by a citizen?
That's why the threats are so off the ranch to most of them, because in their world nothing goes wrong.
Maybe some good can come out of it for us all.

ok, so you support terrorism now, awesome (y)

By the way the date is the anniversary of the Koresh Compound conflict and the Alfred P. Murrah bombing by Timothy McVeigh - I just can't bring myself to believe it is pure coincidence.

[ToucanSpam]

When these whackjobs take to the streets with guns and start firing them at people, there's going to be serious, serious problems in the country.

[DroppinScience]

Why are Democrats shocked by threats of violence?
You are acting as if this just something the extreme right is capable of?
I mean, you sound like you don't believe the American people should be able to protest publicly?

Violence against politicians exists throughout the world.
I'm not advocating this type of behavior, but why are you so shocked?
The GOP already denounced it, but then the Dems are looking for the GOP to stand out in front of this?
Clearly a smear tactic. Nothing unusual there, I guess.

And the GOP is not without some good chuckles too.
Refusing to work past 2pm (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/24/gop-senators-refusing-to_n_511639.html) and commenting that they won't cooperate (http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/89023-mccain-blame-democrats-for-lack-of-senate-cooperation) on any bill for the rest of this Congress' term is a joke.
The more I watch this, the more I realize how foolish we are as Americans for putting up with all this by continuing to vote for these idiots.

I'm not condoning violence, but perhaps these politicians need to be shaken up a bit.
They live in a bubble world where the checks keep rolling in no matter what, while the rest of us struggle day in and day out to make ends meet.
So what if a politician is worried for his or her life.

I mean assassinations are pretty rare.
When was the last time anyone in politics was killed by a citizen?
That's why the threats are so off the ranch to most of them, because in their world nothing goes wrong.
Maybe some good can come out of it for us all.

This is some sick, enabling bullshit on your part. And that's saying something.

"I'm not saying this is a good thing, but Democrats deserve to be shaken up! If a bullet is found in one of their heads, so be it."

For someone so into law and order and upholding the law, you're sure soft on lawlessness.

[Bob]

This is some sick, enabling bullshit on your part. And that's saying something.

"I'm not saying this is a good thing, but Democrats deserve to be shaken up! If a bullet is found in one of their heads, so be it."

For someone so into law and order and upholding the law, you're sure soft on lawlessness.

in rob's defense, he said "politicians", not democrats, and i didn't see him saying anything about wanting anyone to be killed

still, one of the things you have to admire about the democratic form of government is that political controversies are settled by shouting and hyperbole and arcane parliamentary procedures rather than beatings and civil wars and the idea of armed marches and death threats against politicians people don't like for voting for or against laws that they don't like (especially a fucking healthcare bill) make me nervous

[DroppinScience]

in rob's defense, he said "politicians", not democrats, and i didn't see him saying anything about wanting anyone to be killed


This quote:

I'm not condoning violence, but perhaps these politicians need to be shaken up a bit.

What's this supposed to mean, exactly? Sure he claims he doesn't like the tactic of throwing bricks in people's windows, but he more or less thinks it's fine that mob rule and mob tactics scares elected officials.

What if, lord forbid, some nutjob actually does the unthinkable and assassinates one or more politician? Yeah, I guess they'll be "shaken up," but at what cost?

[RobMoney$]

This is some sick, enabling bullshit on your part. And that's saying something.

"I'm not saying this is a good thing, but Democrats deserve to be shaken up! If a bullet is found in one of their heads, so be it."




Kaiser & You play the stereotypical liberal "VICTIM" role so well on here they should nominate you for some sort of year-end BBMB award.

If you reread what I wrote you'll see that I criticized the Republican politicians right along with the Democratic ones.
THEY ALL NEED TO BE WOKEN THE HELL UP!
This is an embarressing display from both sides.

I never advocated violence, all I'm saying is I'm not shedding a tear because they're scared.
Perhaps if they don't like being in this situation, they'll think twice before disregarding poll after poll after Scott Brown election and decide to enact laws with shady "Chicago-style" politics that fly in the face of how our democratic process is intended to work the next time they vote on such a bill.

That's why I posted "Resisting Obamacare, Gandhi style" article after I made the post in this thread.


For someone so into law and order and upholding the law, you're sure soft on lawlessness.

No, I'm not advocating lawlessness.
I'm advocating protest, which is neither against the law or soft.
What it is, is about the MOST American thing you can do.
You're Canadian though, right?
You wouldn't know anything about it, would you?

Just because you see your hippie heros being arrested at protest marches all the time doesn't mean protesting is illegal.
It just means the "victim role-playing" campus fuckfaces are disobeying police orders again.

[yeahwho]

I really haven't seen anything that says the Tea Party is having this March. From the link provided it looks as if the Gun Owners of America (http://secondamendmentmarch.americommerce.com/store/p/71-Gun-Owners-of-America-membership.aspx) is promoting this particular rally. They're different (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_Owners_of_America) than the Tea Party. According to that wiki link Ron Paul loves them.

They should all love President Obama (http://abcnews.go.com/Travel/guns-national-parks-firearms-now-allowed-yellowstone-yosemite/story?id=9910171) too. Obama made it legal to carry loaded concealed weapons in a National Park (http://www.mountainx.com/files/npsfirearmregs.pdf) this year and they are holding their march at the Washington Monument, a National Park.

[travesty]

I'm just fine with this. There is no difference in holding a rally to support the 2nd ammendment than there is in having a rally to support the first ammendment. As long as no laws are broken, big f'n deal. I am sure there will be PLENTY of law enforcement hanging around for this one.
If it helps scare the politicians, even better. That's what the second ammendment is for.

[kaiser soze]

Well I'll be damned

The Ass calling for the March is quite possibly on Government disability. (Of course many who are protesting this reform are on some form of disability or SS)

http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/libertarian-who-urged-patriots-break-0

Vanderboegh said he once worked as a warehouse manager but now lives on government disability checks. He said he receives $1,300 a month because of his congestive heart failure, diabetes and hypertension. He has private health insurance through his wife, who works for a company that sells forklift products.

If anyone follows this fuck, they're fucking lemurs.