Re: Mamma Mia: the movie
I read a funny review that brought up a good point. meryl streep is 59, and her movie daughter is 20...but when they do flash backs with the men who might be her father, they're hippies/70's looking. but 20 years ago it was 1988 and meryl streep (who was supposed to be all wild and slutty at the time) would've been 39...?
I guess maybe the movie could be set in the late 80's and meryl was just playing a part of a woman who should be at least 15 years younger. dang, that's a pretty big stretch though. strange lack of awareness in this one.
btw, I didn't think it was going to be "good", I thought it might be at least a little entertaining. bleh.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freebasser
So wait, this guy is driving around in his jeep with his cat and his television in the back and he's got his favourite music blaring away and... I think I've missed the point.
|
|
|