Quote:
Originally Posted by Micodin
Catch up. They literally had listening sessions and reviews for part 1. It's crazy how people revise history and ignore facts. |
Now you're messing it up!
The part one that follows our timeline's part two (which itself started life as our part one) started its life as part two. The 2009 article refers to this part one as part two because it follows a precedent release, being 2009s part one, however at the junction of realities, it swapped over, part one became part two, and was subsequently intended to be followed by part one, the intended part two to a 2009 release of part one before it became 2011s part two.