The Family Album

[ET]

Originally Posted by Bob

no that's skye

Then who's this?

[taquitos]

sorry to interrupt the what-have-you, but look, my hair
is long enough to put in a pony tail on top of my head:

[taquitos]

see?!!

[Manticore]

Originally Posted by taquitos

sorry to interrupt the what-have-you, but look, my hair
is long enough to put in a pony tail on top of my head:

[taquitos]

i would only wear it like that in public if i was drunk or, ^ yeah, fighting dragons or something.

[Jitters]

Originally Posted by jackrock

So umm... Is that your baby?

Nawwwww.... It's my niece. She stays with me and my parents so we're always doing something stupid together.

17 with a baby? I would have asked somebody to shoot me already.

[monkey]

i've never been quite so amused by myself as i am right now with this photo. i
just have to share it.



that's ebola

[mikizee]

Them's titties

[jabumbo]

what ^he^ said!

[camo]

Originally Posted by beastieboysbaby

lol i know im in a awkward position .

blimey check out those pins! I've photographed leg and footwear models who's legs you put to shame!

[russhie]

^ so she puts them to shame, or they put her to shame?

Confused.

[hitmonlee]

"who's legs you put to shame!"
she puts the models legs to shame.
ez

[russhie]

Isn't it 'whose'? It's posessive, right?

I realised it's just the end bit that's awkward to read, if I read it too fast the you and put become interchangeable. Hence the confusion.

[na§tee]

yes, it is whose. i used to be camo's personal grammar and spelling nazi but i gave up : ) he loves it really.

pauli, i ♥ your virus!

[camo]

I only pretend to love it because you threatened to have some Labrador's attack me.

My grammar is generally perfect when I write by hand but I make a lot of school boy errors when I type for some reason. Typlexsic?

What I meant is that her legs are a lot better than some footwear models who have turned up to a few of my shoots at work.

Here is a typical model. Thats me at the bottom left with the tattoo on my wrist.

[russhie]

I assisted on a fashion spread once for work experience, and I had to do all the crappy jobs (goes without saying). One of them was strapping the model into heels for the next shot while she had her makeup re-touched, and her skin was unbelievably soft. Like, I exfoliate and moisturise religiously and I've never gotten to that level of softness. She was also really nice. Life's not fair.

[camo]

So you were the assistant to the stylist?


Here's the finished shot after I'd photoshopped the life out of it!

[na§tee]

for a long time i believed my ankles were too 'thick'. thick ankles. legs like treetrunks. so i neglected my feet (along with everything else) and treated them like what they essentially are - tools to get from a to b. i always wonder what it would be like to have pretty feet. i have bought lotions and potions and started routines but i never keep them up. i am way too lazy. i care enough to wonder what it would be like to have attractive tootsies, but not enough to put any effort into it. pretty feet are beyond me. pedicures, manicures, i've been late on that train and i'm never going to catch it at this stage. i may get my first ever pedicure this summer though, just so i can experience being unashamed in sandals for, oh.. all of one week.

[camo]

post them tooties, I'll rate them seeing as i'm an expert as of late

[russhie]

Originally Posted by camo

So you were the assistant to the stylist?


Here's the finished shot after I'd photoshopped the life out of it!

Yeah, it was great - I really did love it, the pace and just the feeling of the whole shoot coming together.

I'd LOVE for someone to photoshop the fuck out of me, just once. Everybody knows magazine pictures are photoshopped massively, but it wasn't until I had a chat with one of the guys at ACP that I realised the extent - in some cases it was just ridic. Total eye opener.

[camo]

Originally Posted by russhie

Yeah, it was great - I really did love it, the pace and just the feeling of the whole shoot coming together.

I'd LOVE for someone to photoshop the fuck out of me, just once. Everybody knows magazine pictures are photoshopped massively, but it wasn't until I had a chat with one of the guys at ACP that I realised the extent - in some cases it was just ridic. Total eye opener.

I'll sort you out, but I need a semi good hi-res shot to start with

[russhie]

I can rule that, haha- semi-good is a bit out of my reach. Also, I understand what high-res means, but what is it actually? (What makes something high-res is what I mean. I think) Is it really really time intensive? I suppose it depends on how, er, faulty the subject matter is, maybe? Fucking 20 questions, right here.

*is not smart*

[camo]

hi res is basically image quality. 300dpi (dots per inch) is industry standard.

By semi good I just meant lit well and not a phone pic!

[hpdrifter]

Me too me too!

Start a thread, camo, make us all look like models!

[jabumbo]

russhie: give him the full photo of that avatar of yours...

[trailerprincess]

So mature

[RoryMC]

[beastieboysbaby]

Originally Posted by camo

blimey check out those pins! I've photographed leg and footwear models who's legs you put to shame!

if you're saying that i have nice legs.....thank you

[russhie]

Originally Posted by camo

hi res is basically image quality. 300dpi (dots per inch) is industry standard.

By semi good I just meant lit well and not a phone pic!

Ah.

How can you tell if something is 300dpi thingamies?

Learning!

[TAL]

Right click>Properties>Summary
Click the Advanced button in the Summary flap is you see it.
And there you have the dpi.