|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Sabotage Usage
The movies I could understand. Yauch himself on these boards said movies are different to him when allowing rights to their music. But by their very own words (really their lawyers' words but nonetheless) when they put out a statement on the whole Goldie "girls" parody
"As creative as it is, make no mistake, your video is an advertisement that is designed to sell a product, and long ago, we made a conscious decision not to permit our music and/or name to be used in product ads" I personally cannot understand how that statement wouldn't be applied to the Destiny video game. It is a product. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Sabotage Usage
Quote:
Edit: I agree though; it is a product and they have forbidden that previously. It may be a catch-all for when the usage is unauthorised?
Last edited by Kid Presentable : 09-20-2017 at 09:50 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Sabotage Usage
Quote:
You're right that we don't know the conditions of THEIR(the band and his wife) approval but we do Know Yauch's request that his music not be used for advertising. That we do know. They're allowed to do whatever they want, my whole thing is that there's always going to be questions raised when the band's music appears in commercials especially after Yauch's will made headlines after his death for not allowing his music in advertising |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Sabotage Usage
Quote:
They all obviously agreed the raised eyebrows were a side-effect they could stand to bear. It just makes me question it less as things like this crop up. It's their IP. The man's widow is comfortable with it.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|