#1
|
||||
|
||||
So now we're terrorists..
http://www.cosmosleft.com/pages/3/index.htm
"So what should happen is that any illegal activity by these protesters should be considered a terrorist act on its face. Putting the lives of New Yorkers in danger by distracting the police is terrorism, period."--Bill O'Reilly You know I never thought much about O'Reilly in the past. He was just an egotistical moron who couldn't be taken seriously because he doesn't even admit that he is right wing. He's one of those guys that should have his picture next to "condescending" in the dictionary. However now he has pissed me off. I am affiliating with terrorists now because I being a true American and protesting a false war? terrorism, n. the use of force and threats to frighten people into obeying completely. --terrorist, n. Webster's I have never forced or threatened anyone into obeying anything. BTW, will any of you be in NYC to protest? I'm having trouble getting the time off because I already vacationed twice this year but I'm hoping I can get out there anyway. Off topic but enjoy http://www.buzzflash.com/bradenton/04/08/bra04084.html
Last edited by D_Raay : 08-27-2004 at 01:33 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: So now we're terrorists..
It seems like he is calling the violent protestors terrorists, not just any protestors.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Re: So now we're terrorists..
It is a moronic use of the word terrorists but I think as paulk says he is refferring to the criminal element rather than the average protester.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: So now we're terrorists..
Actually O'Leilly is trying to paint them all with a broad brush. When he was saying this nonsense on his show, he was showing footage of the WTO protests in Seattle. It was yet another deliberate attempt to mislead, but I don't see the point. No person with half a brain watches Faux News unless it is for the comedy it presents.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Re: So now we're terrorists..
terrorist is such a general and defused word now. You think Tim McVey would have turned "terrorism" into a broad brush.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: So now we're terrorists..
I was objecting to him using the word terrorist at all to describe american citizens protesting whether violently or peacefully. The word has become what it was not meant to be.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: So now we're terrorists..
Quote:
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Re: So now we're terrorists..
That's the whole thing, the protester who uses violence isn't changing anyone's opinion. If anything he is negating his opinion.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Re: So now we're terrorists..
technically, he did say "any illegal activity by these protestors", which i assume means things like throwing rocks in windows and killing people. marching and shouting and making yourself heard is perfectly legal still, hopefully.
still, that's a thin veil he's wearing there. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Re: So now we're terrorists..
Quote:
1) Protestors walking on sidewalks (as evidenced by the police grabbing people at random and arresting them). 2) Riding your bike (see above) 3) Being in possession of medical supplies. 4) Failure to follow police instructions while following police instruction. (this is nothing new) 5) Wearing suspicious clothing. (?) Really freaking pathetic
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Re: So now we're terrorists..
Quote:
Correct. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Re: So now we're terrorists..
seriously? i didn't know, i hadn't looked into it, i assumed we still had free assembly rights. whoops!
carry on then, bill is fascist |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Re: So now we're terrorists..
And kissing!
Can't forget kissing. People were arrested at the kiss-in yesterday too. Which kind of makes sense since kissing is a pretty serious national security threat. Just making sure it made the list. And I saw a guy that was almost arrested yesterday for having a bullhorn.
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Re: So now we're terrorists..
Quote:
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: So now we're terrorists..
Quote:
\An"arch*ist\ An anarch; one who advocates anarchy of aims at the overthrow of civil government. ter·ror·ism The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons. |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Re: So now we're terrorists..
What does Webster define "babby" as?
I am still waiting for you to point out my sentence structure/grammar errors sport. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: So now we're terrorists..
Quote:
You should slowly read your sentence-in-question closely and look for mistakes. You are now free to blow your head off with a shotgun. Go Nader!!!!! |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Re: So now we're terrorists..
Quote:
Thanks for pointing out my age, but I fail to see it's relevance. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Re: So now we're terrorists..
Quote:
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Re: So now we're terrorists..
Quote:
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
Re: So now we're terrorists..
I see the definition of terrorism has changed over the years.
I deliberately used the Websters edition from 1963 for my definition. Just happened to have one from then and figured that the word would be morphed in later editions.
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Re: So now we're terrorists..
HAHAHAH, well atleast in the US you don´t just end up missing.
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Re: So now we're terrorists..
Quote:
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Re: So now we're terrorists..
Errr I guess you don't understand the debate.
Debating whether the word "terrorist" is being used correctly is the debate not what O'Leilly said.
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Re: So now we're terrorists..
Quote:
"Look, Sy Hersh is the closest thing American journalism has to a terrorist, frankly." - Richard Perle on CNN http://www.buzzflash.com/analysis/03/03/10_perle.html
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|