Significant Other

[miss soul fire]

His hands look pretty nice to me.

[Mustangjen808]

Beth-You said on the bound to happend thread that Mr. Beth doesnt give back so maybe $40 is abit to high.

[bigblu89]

[bigblu89]

for thhose interested, I'll try to find a better pic.

[miss soul fire]

I can't believe I've ever fall in love with this guy.



EEEKKK!! Hahahaha!

He's sooo last year!!!

[HEIRESS]

Originally posted by bigblu89

awwwwwwwwwwwwww!!!!!!!!!!!

[bigblu89]

Yeah. Now I'm just another sucker that got roped into getting married. Made out like a bandit with the gifts though.

[Beth]

Originally posted by Mustangjen808
Beth-You said on the bound to happend thread that Mr. Beth doesnt give back so maybe $40 is abit to high.

When I told him I was selling him on the internet for $40, he asked why I was selling him for so much money.

After my cut of his paycheck, there's still plenty left over, so he could be worth the $40 when you factor that in.

[ChrisLove]

Originally posted by Beth

After my cut of his paycheck, there's still plenty left over, so he could be worth the $40 when you factor that in.

Sorry to interupt in but I have some financial information on the above proposed transaction.

It is assumed the buyer is responcible for feeding/clothing Beths husband and we assume this costs approx $5 per day.
We seek a 5 year pay back period on investment.
We discount income at 10% which incorperates risk analysis of Beths husband becoming unemployed.
Interest rates at around 5%
Beths Husband depreciates as an asset at 5% pa
Scrap value = $0

The buyer would require $1929.47 of Beths husbands annual income to achieve break even in the five year period.

Further Net present value analysis is not possible without knowing the number of working years remaining in the asset.

If the buyer is responcible for maintaining the asset in retirement a far greater proportion of income will be required. For example if the asset is 30 years old and is expected to retire at 65 and be obselete age 75 one would require $2336.54 of the annual salary in order to break even.

Under these circumstances 5% annual return can be made on $40 investment with $2373.42 of the assets income.

That is all

[Beth]

Originally posted by ChrisLove
Sorry to interupt in but I have some financial information on the above proposed transaction.

It is assumed the buyer is responcible for feeding/clothing Beths husband and we assume this costs approx $5 per day.

See, your whole premise is wrong. Mr. Beth earns all the money. Mr. Beth is responsible for paying all the bills, which of course include shoes (see obligatory shoe thread). So, after my alimony portion and child support, Mr. Beth can still support himself and Mustangjen. She will not need to clothe him, feed him, etc.

You'll have to recalculate using aforementioned factors from this thread and the fact that he lies frequently about stuff that is stupid to lie about. However, catching him in the lies, which is quite easy, results in him not bitching about the new pairs of shoes that appear in the closet, which of course is a huge benefit.

[Beth]

Originally posted by Rykiller
She was only joking, man. I'd rather wait for any Mrs Beth's to come on the market.

Check back around September.

[alruggs]

[Beth]

^ That's when the new Beth comes out -- she comes with her own job/income.

[ChrisLove]

I see, I clearly have underestimated shoe expenditure by several orders of magnitude.

I had rather assumed that as the owner of Mr. Beth you would retain all the income except the small fraction required for the assets maintenance.

I have clearly let you down and offer my resignation as a financial advisor in this matter.

[The Notorious LOL]

Originally posted by Drederick Tatum
am going to have to be the first to comment on seth's hair?

not by a long shot.

[cosmo105]

yes, he's that sexy in person, too. and yes, that is our loyal army of penguins behind him.

[beastieangel01]

Originally posted by cosmo105

yes, he's that sexy in person, too. and yes, that is our loyal army of penguins behind him.

wow it's been a while, last time he had much shorter hair! can you believe coachella=A YEAR AGO?!

[cosmo105]

actually, that pic's pretty old. but yeah...a whole YEAR. a lot has changed since then eh crystalcakes?
and i'm not going this year the most unbelievable lineup ever...and he's a weekend manager now, so he has no life...i wouldn't feel right going without him, because he'd be so insanely jealous. aaaand i can't afford it. so yeah. le sigh.

[Fern]

[Fern]

[poist]

Originally posted by bigblu89

Way to go blu. So who wears the pants in the house?

[King of Rock]

[alruggs]

.

[DandyFop]

But right now we're doing the whole broken up/still together thing

[King of Rock]

Originally posted by Rykiller
What's happened to your face? We all know what you look like. Or was you having a bad face day?

I don't think I've ever looked as bad as on that particular picture. I hadn't slept in 26 hours and I had an eye infection. Also the light from the flash was very very bright. So since this is about significant others I thought I'd edit it.

Originally posted by DandyFop
But right now we're doing the whole broken up/still together thing

i know what you mean. he's cute by the way.

[mythago II]

there should be a thread titled 'seths hair thread' so we could comment on it on a regular basis

[Mustangjen808]

Originally posted by ChrisLove
Sorry to interupt in but I have some financial information on the above proposed transaction.

It is assumed the buyer is responcible for feeding/clothing Beths husband and we assume this costs approx $5 per day.
We seek a 5 year pay back period on investment.
We discount income at 10% which incorperates risk analysis of Beths husband becoming unemployed.
Interest rates at around 5%
Beths Husband depreciates as an asset at 5% pa
Scrap value = $0

The buyer would require $1929.47 of Beths husbands annual income to achieve break even in the five year period.

Further Net present value analysis is not possible without knowing the number of working years remaining in the asset.

If the buyer is responcible for maintaining the asset in retirement a far greater proportion of income will be required. For example if the asset is 30 years old and is expected to retire at 65 and be obselete age 75 one would require $2336.54 of the annual salary in order to break even.

Under these circumstances 5% annual return can be made on $40 investment with $2373.42 of the assets income.

That is all

hahahahahaha